States No Longer Wedded to Idea of Alimony for Life; Bay State Unties Knot

By Wetzstein, Cheryl | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), July 29, 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

States No Longer Wedded to Idea of Alimony for Life; Bay State Unties Knot


Wetzstein, Cheryl, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Byline: Cheryl Wetzstein, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The traditional idea that post-divorce alimony payments should last until death do us part may itself be on its deathbed.

By a unanimous vote Thursday of its state Senate, Massachusetts joined a growing number of states that are junking the old model of virtually unlimited support payments to an ex-spouse.

While some divorce attorneys and marriage-law specialists fear the reforms may go too far, there has been a clear trend in states from Rhode Island and Pennsylvania to Texas and Utah to place new caps, time and age limits, and income criteria on alimony payments, reflecting in part social changes over the past few decades and the changing status of women in the workplace.

Just this year, Florida state lawmakers passed a law holding that the divorced spouse responsible for the alimony did not have to pay if the partner's net income was significantly higher. Tennessee's state Supreme Court is also currently weighing a challenge to the idea of lifetime alimony.

The vote in Massachusetts means that the Bay State is catching up to other states regarding alimony laws, said Linda Lea M. Viken, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

The whole purpose of alimony is to allow a former spouse to maintain their standard of living from at the time of the marriage, said Ms. Viken, a former judge and lawmaker in South Dakota.

So for years, alimony used to be, in many states, permanent, like it is in Massachusetts, she said.

But as the U.S. culture changed and more women entered the workforce, many states updated their alimony laws, she said, leaving Massachusetts as a little unique in still having this really strong, permanent-alimony law.

Texas and Mississippi are among the states that award alimony only in marriages lasting 10 years or more. In Utah, an ex-spouse can only be forced to pay alimony for a period of time equal to the length of the marriage.

The Massachusetts bill means alimony won't be an entitlement for life, said Steve Hitner, who turned to credit cards and home-equity loans to make the $865-a-week alimony payments to his ex-wife. His experience led him to create Massachusetts Alimony Reform, which helped pushed the bill through the state legislature.

Just before Thursday's 36-0 vote, state Sen. Gale D. Candara predicted the bill would modernize outmoded alimony law, which has not been touched for 21 years.

It offers a good balance between finality and fair play, she said.

The House passed the bill July 20, also unanimously.

If signed by Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, state judges will have new guidelines on how to fashion the size and duration of alimony payments that one ex-spouse will be required to pay to the other.

Many payments will be time-limited: Couples who divorce before five years can expect alimony to last a few months or years; couples who divorce after a decades-long marriage might receive alimony until the payer reaches official retirement age, such as 66.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

States No Longer Wedded to Idea of Alimony for Life; Bay State Unties Knot
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?