The Use of Co-Assessment in Motivating Tutorial Attendance, Preparation and Participation in Engineering Subjects

By Summit, R.; Venables, A. | Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, October 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Use of Co-Assessment in Motivating Tutorial Attendance, Preparation and Participation in Engineering Subjects


Summit, R., Venables, A., Australasian Journal of Engineering Education


1 INTRODUCTION

It is a well-reported problem in the education literature that "students undertaking university courses skip classes on a not infrequent basis" and that "non-attendance at university is an ongoing problem that appears to transcend country, university and discipline" (Cleary-Holdforth, 2007). Yet there is much evidence that university students should attend scheduled classes to optimise their learning and eventual grades (Moore et al, 2008). This is particularly true when it comes to sessions offered in support of lectures, such as tutorials and laboratory classes. Tutorials provide a focus for discussion around salient lecture content and importantly, they provide opportunities for students to practise their problem solving and communication skills (Biggs & Tang, 2007).

Tutorials are of particular importance in engineering education because of the applied nature of the subjects taught. O'Moore & Baldock (2007) asserted that "problem-based learning and tutorial assignments are essential for student learning in engineering courses" and that without regular practice, the required skills are difficult to acquire. Alpay (2001) noted that the applied nature of engineering and science subjects means that students require a good understanding of mathematical concepts and their applications.

The many benefits of tutorials can only occur when students attend regularly, come suitably prepared and actively participate. However, many studies have indicated that this does not happen. For example, both Fry (1990) and Sisson & Warton (2005) reported that although students were instructed to tackle problems at home and then seek assistance during tutorials, it was found, to their detriment, that most students were making a first attempt at problems during the tutorials. Many researchers have concluded that most students need a motivator to complete tutorial problems on a regular basis.

A number of studies have shown a positive relationship between tutorial attendance and overall assessment performance (Gatherer & Manning, 1998; Longhurst, 1999; Sharma et al, 2005; Cohn & Johnson, 2006), while other studies have been able to show that student attendance is a useful predictor of participation and overall performance (McCarey et al, 2007; Smith, 2008). Using data collected over three consecutive semesters, covering five core units (in mathematics, statistics and physics) of the mining engineering program at the Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), a significant linear relationship (at the 0.01 level) was obtained with a positive correlation of 0.67 (figure 1). Further evidence would be needed to establish causal effect here, but that is not the focus of this study. Note that the 10 and 90 percentiles shown in figure 1 indicate that minimal tutorial attendance was needed for some students to pass units, while others failed units despite regular attendance. It therefore makes sense that a program to motivate tutorial attendance should be aimed at the majority of students.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Academic staff at WASM noted that students who failed to avail themselves of the full benefits of practice and feedback afforded by the tutorial sessions were impacted negatively in their understanding of concepts and in their subsequent grades. To address these concerns, it was necessary for academic staff to find a mechanism to help overcome these issues. This paper describes an intervention designed to tackle the problem of poor tutorial attendances and performances at WASM. Peer tutoring together with peer and tutor assessments were incorporated in the intervention, which was conducted with several cohorts of students. An evaluation of the intervention using student feedback surveys is reported in this paper.

2 SEARCHING FOR A SOLUTION

Typically, in engineering and technical subjects, students are expected to develop their skills by regularly completing given sets of practice problems.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Use of Co-Assessment in Motivating Tutorial Attendance, Preparation and Participation in Engineering Subjects
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?