Why Primary Care Is Undervalued

The Florida Times Union, September 25, 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Why Primary Care Is Undervalued


If a new lawsuit is to be believed, a decline in the supply of primary care physicians is more than chance.

It is being caused in large part from payment schedules designed to favor specialists at the expense of the doctors on the medical front lines.

The issue was brought to the forefront by a group of primary care doctors based in Augusta, Ga.

This group, the Center for Primary Care, provides primary care to one-fourth of Augusta's population.

In the suit filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the doctors allege that a valuation process managed by the American Medical Association is influential in setting Medicare reimbursement schedules that undervalue primary care.

The AMA committee that comes up with the value is dominated by specialists, they claim.

Medicare is the largest single payer in the American health care system. So when Medicare sets rates, the impact spreads throughout health care system.

The AMA group is called the Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee - RUC for short.

Members must sign confidentiality agreements.

Thomas Scully, former administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), has stated that the AMA system is "indefensible" and that "it's not healthy to have the interested party essentially driving the decision-making process."

That's called a conflict of interest.

The lawsuit quotes Kerry Weems, acting administrator of CMS, who stated that the schedule "disadvantages primary care" and "created distortions in our payment system that makes moving to value-driven health care difficult."

THE AMA RESPONDS

The AMA provided the following statement from Barbara Levy, a Seattle-area gynecologist who leads the RUC:

"The RUC is an independent panel of physicians from all medical specialties, including primary care, who make recommendations to CMS as all citizens have a right to do. These volunteers provide physicians' voice and expertise to Medicare decision-makers through their recommendations."

Levy understates the power of the RUC. CMS, which oversees Medicare, typically follow at least 90 percent of the RUC's recommendations.

Michael Maves, CEO of the AMA, wrote in a letter last April to U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., that the RUC has consistently recommended increases for primary care and that primary care membership on the RUC is far greater than primary care services.

McDermott introduced legislation that would require the CMS to take into account the input of neutral third party analysts in addition to the RUC.

Nevertheless, a March report by the Congressional watchdog Medpac stated, "Compensation was lower for primary care physicians than for some specialists, and the disparity between them is large enough to raise concerns about equity and the future of the physician work force.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Why Primary Care Is Undervalued
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?