Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Viewing Development through an Occupational Lens: Learning to Handwrite

By: Robinson, Rita; Penman, Merrolee | New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, September 2011 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Viewing Development through an Occupational Lens: Learning to Handwrite


Robinson, Rita, Penman, Merrolee, New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy


Handwriting is a valued childhood occupation (Amundson, 1992), and considered a prerequisite for later academic achievement (Feder & Majnemer, 2007; Graham Berninger, Abott, Abott & Whitaker, 1997; Graham & Harris, 2000). A child's developing sense of self occurs through opportunities for engagement in challenging occupations (Farnworth, 2000; Passmore, 2003) which society deems meaningful and important. Success in learning to handwrite can build a child's self-esteem (Sassoon, 1990; Stewart, 1992), and foster feelings of emotional well-being and social functioning (Cornhill & Case Smith, 1996). Therefore engagement in the task of handwriting is of concern to occupational therapists as difficulties engaging in this occupation can have negative effects on a student's occupational development.

There is a growing expectation for occupational therapists to complete handwriting interventions in the context in which they occur. To do this well, occupational therapists need to understand the relationship between the teachers' task of teaching handwriting and the students' role in learning to handwrite both of which are influenced by the person, occupation and environment fit. This research article considers the human environment of the teacher in the co-occupation of learning to handwriting. Acknowledging the classroom context and the teacher's role in the task of learning to handwrite reflects the professions move to complete interventions within the naturally occurring environments. To facilitate understanding of the context and process this qualitative research study asked six new entrant teachers: How do new entrant teachers teach handwriting to year one students, while acknowledging the physical and sociocultural environments which shape their practice?

Literature search

The traditional handwriting approaches used by occupational therapists to address handwriting difficulties focus on areas such as pencil grip, seating posture, co-ordination of the muscles of the hand as well as visual perception. This way of approaching an occupational concern is often referred to as 'bottom-up' approach (Ideshi, 2003; Weinstock-Zlotnick & Hinojosa, 2004). This approach fitted well with the medical model emphasis on 'fixing the problem'; the problem being an outcome of delayed or altered developmental processes. The three main approaches guiding reasoning behind this way of thinking are the biomechanical, neuromuscular, and multisensory approaches (Admundson, 1992).

Multisensory or the sensorimotor approach is still very popular as a way of addressing handwriting difficulties (Feder, Majnemer & Synnes, 2000; Woodward & Swinth, 2002). In this approach to handwriting the therapist provides various sensory experiences such as writing in shaving cream or writing with chalk. The assumption being that if the task of handwriting is learnt through a variety of sensory mediums it will assist in the child's learning (Admundson, 1992). The biomechanical approach and the neuromuscular approach place a larger emphasis on the sitting posture of the child and the development of the hand muscles and pencil grasp.

These bottom-up perspectives provide useful information from a body structures perspective (World Health Organisation, 2001) enabling therapists to consider the component skills that influence a task. However, to adequately express our unique role in supporting children with handwriting difficulties, inquiry methods that reflect our professional paradigm of occupational based intervention are required (Humphry & Wakefield, 2006). This perspective provides occupational therapists with a way to view child development and childhood tasks through an 'occupational lens' (Davis & Polatajko, 2004). The benefits of such a view have been validated through research (Chapparo & Hooper, 2002; 2005; Wiseman, Davis, & Polatajko (2005).

An occupational lens

Inquiry using an occupational lens broadens the knowledge already gathered on hand development and handwriting to also include expectations, experiences, and meaning surrounding the task (Lawlor, 2003). Opportunities for increased awareness of the interactions that occur between the child and the environment, both human and non human can also be facilitated (Nelson, & Jepsen-Thomas, 2003). Utilising an occupational lens therefore supports the premise that learning to handwrite is the result of a person, task and environment interaction. In acknowledging the interactions between these three factors (person, task and environment) therapists' interventions can move closer to the modern consultative service delivery models endorsed by the Ministry of Education (Hasselbusch, 2007). This also reflects contemporary professional beliefs about the importance of participation, belonging, and connectedness (Wilcock, 2006). These contemporary professional beliefs are often initiated by using a top down approach and enabled by engaging in services that occur in the tasks natural context. This type of service is often described as ecologically based services.

Ideshi (2003) defines 'top down' approach as looking at the life role or occupations which are meaningful to the person as the first point of inquiry. For children, top-down inquiry starts with participation (Primeau & Ferguson, 1999). Participation for children is often dependent on the adults in their lives being able to afford (to give) them opportunities which are growth-enhancing and assist the child to develop skills which will allow a positive future (Primeau & Ferguson, 1999). Teachers, especially teachers of new entrant children, offer the opportunity to learn handwriting in a structured way. Therefore when studying children's participation in handwriting, inquiry needs to start with this group. The teacher is central to the experience of learning to handwrite as they influence what is done, and how it is done. To frame this research a basic understanding of the educational context which influences teaching practices needs to be considered.

Aotearoa / New Zealand education context

Educational context is greatly influenced by the policy and resources available to support teacher training and in classroom practices. Educational resources include the Formation Guide (Department of Education, 1985) and the

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?