Obama, Ryan, and the Future of Regulatory Reform: An "Upstream" Approach to Reform Would Reassert Congressional Authority, Saving Jobs and Lowering Compliance Costs

By Brannon, Ike; Batkins, Sam | Regulation, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Obama, Ryan, and the Future of Regulatory Reform: An "Upstream" Approach to Reform Would Reassert Congressional Authority, Saving Jobs and Lowering Compliance Costs


Brannon, Ike, Batkins, Sam, Regulation


Washington, D.C. may have once been known for politicians ignoring the fiscal realities of its making, but it now appears awash in budget blueprints. Rep. Paul Ryan's (R, Wisc.) plan, "The Path to Prosperity," aims to cut $6.2 trillion in government spending over the next decade. President Obama's vision, as outlined in his April 13 speech at George Washington University, seeks to reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the next 10 years.

How these competing visions for the role of government arrive at their reductions is drastically different. However, both plans provide few details about the future of our regulatory environment and the burden it imposes on businesses and consumers.

Ryan's plan does at least address the $1.75 trillion in estimated regulatory costs. It goes further to propose a streamlined regulatory process and measures to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil President Obama's budget is mostly silent on regulatory reform, but his Executive Order 13563 and his budget for Fiscal Year 2012 shed light on the impact regulations have on job creation and destruction. Regardless of the budget plan put forth, U.S. businesses will suffer if Washington does not begin to regulate its regulators at the same time it tries to put its fiscal house in order.

Attempts at Reform

Although attempts at federal regulatory reform stretch back 65 years to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the results of "major" overhauls have produced only modest results and higher price tags for compliance. As George Washington University professor Susan Dudley has found, the cost of regulations has more than doubled over the past 20 years and the Federal Register continues to eclipse 70,000 pages a year.

What is missing? Previous reform attempts have all focused on "downstream" approaches by trying to rein in onerous regulations after they have been promulgated. One pitfall of this strategy is that agencies generally have a legal obligation to enforce laws passed by Congress and many independent regulatory authorities escape the scrutiny of reform efforts. Subsequent Congresses might try to curb administrative authority, but as long as each regulation withstands the "arbitrary and capricious" standard of the APA, federal courts are usually willing to uphold agency rules.

In a perfect world, Congress would simply stop passing laws that contain countless federal mandates and unchecked rulemaking authority. Absent this utopian reality, a better approach would focus "upstream," allowing Congress to restrict administrative agencies before giving them rulemaking authority during the legislative process. This could yield fewer and less costly regulations and, unlike the legislative veto, it would be constitutional. This approach would insert specific guidelines into all major legislation imposing federal mandates, including:

* requiring agencies to conduct reviews of regulations once implemented,

* demanding agencies rescind duplicative rules,

* placing a limit on the number of regulations an agency could promulgate during implementation of a particular law,

* establishing regulatory "pay as you go" that would require the elimination of a rule whenever a new rule is adopted, and

* prohibiting new regulations where costs exceed benefits.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

This "upstream" approach would end the regulation "whack-a-mole" strategy that has dominated the conversation for generations and instead focus on Congress placing limits on regulations before agencies implement federal mandates. The benefit of this approach is to (reasonably) restrain regulators before they exceed power given to them by Congress.

Ideally, a comprehensive reform package that implements each of these reforms would pass Congress. Absent that scenario, the House Committee on Rules would require that all major legislation include these reform proposals, similar to the recent move to include "Constitutional Authority Statements" in all legislation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Obama, Ryan, and the Future of Regulatory Reform: An "Upstream" Approach to Reform Would Reassert Congressional Authority, Saving Jobs and Lowering Compliance Costs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?