Capital Controls Gain Currency in Today's Global Economy: Global Investors Have Poured Money into Some Emerging-Market Economies (EMEs) Because They Offer Higher Returns Than Do the More Advanced Economies. That's a Win-Win for Everyone-Right? Not Necessarily. for Many EMEs, This Deluge of Foreign Capital Can Create Economic Imbalances That Traditional Monetary Policy Alone May Not Be Able to Fix. What Can EME Policymakers Do?

EconSouth, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Capital Controls Gain Currency in Today's Global Economy: Global Investors Have Poured Money into Some Emerging-Market Economies (EMEs) Because They Offer Higher Returns Than Do the More Advanced Economies. That's a Win-Win for Everyone-Right? Not Necessarily. for Many EMEs, This Deluge of Foreign Capital Can Create Economic Imbalances That Traditional Monetary Policy Alone May Not Be Able to Fix. What Can EME Policymakers Do?


Policymakers often argue for a particular policy with the intention of making their country, state, or city a good place to invest or more attractive for foreign capital. The flow of capital into the United States, for example--whether through a Japanese automaker building a plant in Georgia or a Swiss banker purchasing shares of Apple--is considered by most a desirable outcome. But for some EMEs experiencing high rates of growth and growing inflows of foreign capital, such investment demand can bring many challenges.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

But isn't foreign capital a good thing?

What sort of challenges do these fast-growing EMEs face? Doesn't development theory predict that it's exactly these countries that should have higher rates of return on investment? China, for one, has had sustained growth rates of more than 10 percent for most of the past two decades. Likewise, India and Brazil have seen their economies expand with enormous speed in recent years. But an influx of foreign capital brings with it a host of unintended side effects. Exchange rate appreciation, for example, can occur rapidly, which can harm the competitiveness of domestic exporters. It's precisely this concern that has compelled China to implement strict domestic investment restrictions and deliberate exchange rate management. The country's policymakers want to prevent the renminbi from appreciating so rapidly that it puts its export-oriented growth model at risk.

Foreign capital inflows can also be fickle. Receiving countries may be susceptible to "sudden stops," when foreign investors quickly run for the exits at the first sign of trouble in an economy. The Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s was a painful reminder of how foreign capital--at first a sign of burgeoning growth--can severely exacerbate an emerging financial crisis. Following a run-up in asset prices, which were fueled by foreign investment, the economies of Indonesia, Thailand, and South Korea, for example, saw their currencies depreciate sharply as foreign credit abruptly fled their troubled financial systems.

The experience of these Asian countries has been an important lesson for EME policymakers, especially in the recovery from the recent, global financial crisis. Many global investors have poured money into some of these EMEs because they offer higher returns than the more advanced economies. This deluge of capital combined with the fear of overheating and of "sudden withdrawal" has led some countries to implement capital controls. By imposing limits on the amount or type of foreign capital flowing into or out of a country, these tools help EMEs manage their risk.

Capital controls may take the form of a tax on foreign capital inflows or quotas on investment. EMEs can also limit volatility in flows by requiring that a certain percentage of foreign investment be held in reserve for a specified number of days at the receiving country's central bank. This type of control, called a "lock-in" policy, prevents sudden withdrawals of capital.

Although EME policymakers are increasingly turning to capital controls, these tools have not necessarily been popular, at least among most economists and policymakers in developed countries, not to mention in the financial services industry. Advocates of international financial liberalization see capital controls as having inefficient, distortionary effects for any country adopting them. Sebastian Edwards of the University of California, Los Angeles, for example, argued in a 1998 paper that the 1980s Latin American implementation of capital controls was counterproductive. And until recently, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), seen as the global authority on matters of foreign capital management, had maintained a policy that capital controls were ineffective (at best), if not harmful (at worst). However, capital controls are increasingly being called for by domestic-oriented manufacturers and exporters in EMEs with strong currencies--and, under certain circumstances, even approved by the IMF.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Capital Controls Gain Currency in Today's Global Economy: Global Investors Have Poured Money into Some Emerging-Market Economies (EMEs) Because They Offer Higher Returns Than Do the More Advanced Economies. That's a Win-Win for Everyone-Right? Not Necessarily. for Many EMEs, This Deluge of Foreign Capital Can Create Economic Imbalances That Traditional Monetary Policy Alone May Not Be Able to Fix. What Can EME Policymakers Do?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?