Civil-Military Relations in Emergency Management: Federal, State, and Local Emergency Management Programs Are Now Part of the Nation's Defense and Security

By Sylves, Richard T. | The Public Manager, Fall 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Civil-Military Relations in Emergency Management: Federal, State, and Local Emergency Management Programs Are Now Part of the Nation's Defense and Security


Sylves, Richard T., The Public Manager


Both U.S. civil defense of the past and homeland security of the present demonstrate that disaster policy has always had a degree of national security and military penetration. However, few appreciate how dramatic the latest penetration of military and national security matters has been in American emergency and public management. There are both positives and negatives associated with ramping up militarization and national security presence in emergency management specifically, and public management more generally.

Since 1950, each president's national security policy has involved civil defense or homeland security in some manner. In times when civil defense against nuclear attack (1950-1991) was the federal emergency management priority, much of disaster policy was imposed from the "top-down" in the federal system. Remember, emergency management in the United States is supposed to be from the "bottom-up," with local governments seeking supplemental help from their state government and the federal government. The Clinton administration (1993-2001) made possible a temporary respite from civil defense worries when the Cold War ended, although foreign terrorism against the U.S. homeland was not yet recognized outside of national security circles as a major threat.

9/11

Following the 9/11/2001 terror attacks, U.S. disaster policy became a top-down, president- and federal-dominated system. State and municipal governments today carry a considerable portfolio of national security-related duties--many implemented through homeland security grant programs. Conditions specified in the law and grant rules of federal homeland security programs have significant effects on the substance and process of federal, state, and local emergency management specifically, and public management more generally.

Homeland security has militarized the disaster policy and emergency management, but sociological research has demonstrated that the military culture and the civilian culture are highly incompatible. Homeland security has come to Main Street, and federal emergency management is the chief vehicle transporting it.

In some respects, modern homeland security policy builds on those areas where there is a positive overlap and compatibility of domestic emergency management and terrorism consequence management. Anti-terror emergency management and conventional disaster management may actually complement each other better today than during the Cold War of 1946-1990 because of the range of weapons and instruments potentially available to modern terrorists and the damage these might cause. Admittedly, this claim is subject to dispute.

Military Involvement in Emergency Management

James Miskel, a student of military and national security studies and an expert on emergency management, points to many examples of U.S. military involvement in response to domestic disasters (Miskel, 2006: 39). Here are a few examples of positive overlap of military and civilian emergency:

* Preparation for hazardous materials incidents overlaps much of the preparation for chemical weapons and bioterrorism preparedness.

* Preparedness and response planning for a major urban earthquake parallels some elements of preparedness and response planning for the detonation of a low-yield nuclear weapon in a large metropolitan area.

* Hurricane evacuation planning dovetails civil evacuation planning for dirty bomb incidents.

Certainly there are many other examples. Miskel (2006: 41) posits that "one of the underlying and enduring assumptions of the U.S civil defense program was that much of the investment in civil defense would improve the nation's capacity for responding to natural disasters." An interesting question today is whether the same can be said for U.S. homeland security programs.

The military has heft and diversification. Active duty military personnel and National Guard soldiers represent an immensely large workforce.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Civil-Military Relations in Emergency Management: Federal, State, and Local Emergency Management Programs Are Now Part of the Nation's Defense and Security
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?