SADC Adopts the Rule of Lawlessness

Cape Times (South Africa), June 30, 2011 | Go to article overview

SADC Adopts the Rule of Lawlessness


LOCAL elections last month were a success for our democracy but they had an unforeseen spin-off that could prove disastrous for the rule of law in the southern African region.

President Jacob Zuma and Minister of Justice Jeff Radebe, involved in election work at home, were unable to attend several SADC meetings during this time. In their absence, SADC made unprecedented decisions about the future of the judicial body set up to deal with regional litigation on human rights and other issues: SADC leaders effectively dismantled this court and sacked the judges who had served on it.

This court, the SADC Tribunal, led by Ariranga Pillay, a former chief justice of Mauritius, with three other judges seconded from their normal duties in Angola, Botswana and Zambia, had delivered 16 reported decisions by the time it was dumped last month.

Their mandate was to consider cases involving disputes between individuals, legal entities and states on the one hand and SADC states on the other, including labour disputes brought by SADC employees.

It had to apply international law principles and observe all the usual restrictions applicable to regional courts world-wide - for example, litigants were first obliged to exhaust internal legal remedies before asking the tribunal for help. Its 16 judgments fall into three categories. One was a miscellaneous group of three cases involving disputes between aggrieved individuals or companies and particular SADC states.

Another group concerned disputes between SADC staff and SADC itself. These five cases dealt with employment-related litigation, and from the decisions I'd say that SADC would not win any awards as an employer body. The records are full of references to internal SADC sections undergoing major reshuffles and changes in structure with serious consequences for staff; worse, they show that in the cases before the tribunal, SADC did not observe the most fundamental employment principles.

The largest group of cases, eight in all, concerned various forms of human rights abuse experienced by Zimbabwe litigants at the hands of Robert Mugabe's government. Indeed, the court's first case, the one which probably led to the scrapping of the tribunal at the insistence of Zimbabwe last month, was brought by members of a family who asked the court to consider their treatment resulting from the policy of seizing farms and distributing them among Zanu-PF members. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

SADC Adopts the Rule of Lawlessness
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.