The Tea Party's Impact on National Politics

By Wisbey, Jon | Parks & Recreation, November 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Tea Party's Impact on National Politics


Wisbey, Jon, Parks & Recreation


THE "TEA PARTY" MOVEMENT, STARTED IN 2009 as a conservative reaction to a Democratic-controlled Congress and Presidency, has helped center the national political debate on deficit reduction. The November R010 election, which shifted control of the House to Republicans and diminished the Democrats' majority in the Senate, resulted in nearly 100 Republican freshmen representatives and senators. Many of these new members were elected with significant tea party support, and nearly all support sizeable cuts to the federal budget. Since the 112th Congress began in January, these demands for budget cuts have reverberated through Capitol Hill, turning nearly every legislative effort into a referendum on federal spending.

As a result, the first 10 months of 2011 have found leading Republicans and Democrats agreeing on the importance of spending cuts, even as they fought bitterly over the extent and source of those cuts. Debate over FY 2011 funding levels lasted through April, eight months after the fiscal year officially began, and included more than 60 hours of debates in the House centered around H.R. 1, the House's proposed FY 2011 appropriations bill. Despite this extensive debate, H.R. 1--which contained tens of billions of dollars in cuts, including the elimination of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Stateside program--was never adopted by the Senate. Instead, after three temporary funding measures, Congress passed a FY 2011 Continuing Resolution (CR) that included only modest across-the-board funding reductions.

However, not long after the FY 2011 CR resolved the federal budget debate through September 30, 2011, attention in Washington turned to the need to raise the federal debt ceiling--a historically noncontroversial procedure that allows the Administration to borrow money in order to provide funding approved by Congress. While House and Senate leadership negotiated a deficit reduction package, many members of Congress associated with the tea party movement--most prominently Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN)--argued that the debt ceiling should not be raised at all and vowed to oppose any compromise. This steadfast resistance to a bipartisan deal helped strengthen Republican demands for spending cuts. In the end, despite arguing that raising the debt ceiling shouldn't be tied to deficit reduction measures, President Obama and Congressional Democrats reached an agreement with Republicans to raise the debt ceiling that would produce more than $2 trillion in spending cuts.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

For some politicians who have long fought to reduce or eliminate federal funding for parks and recreation, the tea party's support for cutting federal spending has reinvigorated ongoing efforts to stop federal support for parks. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) has led many unsuccessful efforts over his career in the Senate to eliminate the Transportation Enhancements (TE) set-aside, which ensures that states utilize a small portion of their federal highway funding for bike and pedestrian paths and trails, historic preservation, and other non-traditional activities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Tea Party's Impact on National Politics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?