Empirical Evidence on Formal and Material Harmonization of National Accounting Standards

By Lasmin | Journal of International Business Research, September 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Empirical Evidence on Formal and Material Harmonization of National Accounting Standards

Lasmin, Journal of International Business Research


Although the numbers of studies on formal (de jure) and material (de facto) harmonization have increased recently, little evidence of the relationship between both types of harmonization is produced because traditionally researchers prefer to measure each type of harmonization separately. Some argue that measuring formal harmonization is more preferable because of the growing influence of accounting standards to accounting practices (Fontes, Rodrigues, & Craig, 2005; Garrido, Leon, & Zorio, 2002; Rahman, Perera, & Ganeshanandam, 1996); whereas others prefer to measure material harmonization (Herrmann & Thomas, 1995; Archer, Pascale, & McLeay, 1995; Emenyonu & Gray, 1996; Krisement, 1997; Canibano & Mora, 2000) where much of their work is highly influenced by van der Tas (1988, 1992b) and Tay & Parker (1990, 1992), which maintain that the ultimate concern of harmonization is to increase the comparability of financial reporting. Evidence of the relationship between formal and material harmonization, if any, show mixed results where most of researchers found that improvement of formal harmonization leads to that of material harmonization (Morais & Fialho, 2008; Peng, 2005).

This paper integrates formal (de jure) and material (de facto) harmonization measurements into one study. Measurement methods used are Jaccard's Coefficients and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients (Fontes et al., 2005), Euclidean Distances (Fontes et al., 2005), (Garrido, et al., 2002), H index and C index (van der Tas, 1988, 1992b), and Chi-square statistics (Cooper & Schindler, 2001). The benefits of this research are two-fold. First, it serves as a pioneer of comprehensive preliminary assessment of the levels and the progress of formal and material harmonization of Indonesian Accounting Standards (PSAK), which represents developing countries' accounting standards that have not received sufficient attention from accounting scholars. Second, it provides empirical evidence that contradicts mainstream beliefs, where the progress of formal harmonization does not lead to the improvement of material harmonization.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) will be interested in this paper because there are only few empirical studies on formal and material harmonization of developing countries, especially on Indonesia. The board needs to make certain that its third objective, which is promoting convergence between national accounting standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), has been accomplished in developing countries. It can also use the results of this study to better comprehend the extent of harmonization of IFRS among developing economies so that the IASB can devise more suitable strategies and apt accounting standards.

For standards-setting bodies in Indonesia and other developing countries, this study will provide vivid pictures of the positions and improvement of formal and material harmonization of national accounting standards with IFRS. Specifically, it suggests that harmonizing national accounting standards with IFRS might not result in more comparable financial reporting.

Development of Indonesian Accounting Standards

Indonesian Institute of Accountants (IAI) is the only accounting profession body in Indonesia. The institute was established in 1957 in order to govern and coordinate the activities of accountants that comprise financial accountants, management accountants, government accountants, and academic accountants (Foo, 1997). Started with only 30 members, in 2005 the membership grew to approximately 6,000 accountants out of about total 40,000 accountants in Indonesia (Kusuma, 2005). In 2007, the IAI has issued 59 Indonesian Accounting Standards (PSAK) and 6 Indonesian Islamic Accounting Standards in 2007. The latter were internally developed by the IAI, the former were fully and partially adopted and adapted from standards promulgated by the IASB and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), subjected to slight and significant additions and deductions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Empirical Evidence on Formal and Material Harmonization of National Accounting Standards


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?