Politicizing the Judges: Human Rights Legislation

By Callinan, I. D. F.; Stoker, Amanda | University of Queensland Law Journal, June 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Politicizing the Judges: Human Rights Legislation


Callinan, I. D. F., Stoker, Amanda, University of Queensland Law Journal


Some 20 years ago when the decisions in ACTV (1) and Lange (2) were handed down, there was jubilation in the corridors of some of the 'progressive' law campuses of Australia. The cry went up, 'Dare to be adventurous!' The realpolitik of the separation of powers has, however, so far prevailed.

Human rights are ultimately the implied terms of an ideal social contract. The social contract at any time is the sum of the constitution, legislation validly made under it, and the conventions and values of society itself. The conventions and values include the evolving common law, the morals, ethics, and experience of Australia as a long-standing, in relative terms, democracy. Legislation is the articulation in a comprehensible and enforceable form, of the policy of the politicians holding the majority in the Houses of Parliament. Each policy has to make accommodations with other policy. How much reward should there be for merit, innovation and diligence? How should a government allocate and redistribute taxes it collects? How much should it collect? How and in what amount does it make provision for those who cannot provide for themselves? Take freedom of speech. No democratically inclined person would disagree with the proposition that as a concept it is a good thing. Should it however be confined to prevent hate speech or defamation? How is any right to privacy to be reconciled with free speech? Do limitations upon advertising infringe freedom of speech? Should there be film and literature classifications, or censorship of the arts? To what extent should political fundraising be permitted and how should rules for the conduct of elections be framed? These questions, deceptively simply expressed, are in truth very difficult ones. But even more difficult are those that are raised with respect to the reduction of human rights to a written constitutional or legislative form, because experience teaches that no right can be completely uncurtailed at all times for all purposes and all people. This is so even of the basic right to freedom itself.

People who have done no wrong can be detained in quarantine. The customs authorities can detain people. People who have done no wrong but may involuntarily present a risk to themselves or to others can be detained. People have, from time to time, been detained under witness protection schemes. Some people are refused bail and are detained for long periods before they are even committed for trial. Even people who have been convicted and who have reasonable prospects of appealing successfully are rarely released pending the appeal.

Legislation may from time to time also have the purposes of giving legal effect to the conventions and values of society. The identification and boundaries of particular conventions and values can also be difficult. Few societies are homogenous. Values can be diverse. They can change quickly. All of this nation's governments are secular, something that is not always understood by people from different countries. Matters such as religious observance, abortion, discrimination, privacy and necessary exceptions to an absolute right to freedom of speech are controversial. Different circumstances may call for different treatment in law. Many, many freedoms were curtailed between 1939 and 1945 by the National Security Regulations made under the constitutional defence power to meet the exigencies of war. Against this background the first point that we make therefore is that rights made the subject of a bill of rights, whether constitutionally entrenched or enacted, the latter slightly the lesser of two evils because of the possibility of repeal or amendment, are matters for political debate and political, not judicial, resolution. If Parliament is satisfied that wrongs are being done to a vulnerable group of people, it is better that parliament directly enact a law to right those wrongs. This is so for several reasons, two of which are more obvious than others.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Politicizing the Judges: Human Rights Legislation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?