Institute on California and the West Railroaded Workshop, Huntington Library, San Marino, CA, July 9, 2011: Taking Counterfactual History Seriously

By Lamoreaux, Naomi R. | California History, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Institute on California and the West Railroaded Workshop, Huntington Library, San Marino, CA, July 9, 2011: Taking Counterfactual History Seriously


Lamoreaux, Naomi R., California History


How many economists does it take to change a lightbulb? None, the answer goes. If the lightbulb needed changing, the market would have already done it. Now, with the publication of Richard White's book Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America, it appears we will be able to tell the same joke about western historians. That might seem to be an unfair jibe--I am being deliberately provocative in making it--but I would justify this reading of White's book by pointing out that what economists mean today by the term market is generally misunderstood. Most would agree with White's assertion that "there is no such thing as a market set apart from particular state policies, institutions, and social and cultural practices." They also would agree with his follow-on statement: "The question is not whether governments shape markets; it is how they shape markets." (xxv)

Economists generally prefer governments to shape markets by harnessing competitive forces rather than by pursuing an explicit industrial policy, and so it seems does White. The root of all the evils he depicts in his book was government subsidization of the transcontinental railroads: "[W]ithout the extensive subsidization of a transcontinental railroad network, there might very well have been less waste, less suffering, less environmental degradation, and less catastrophic economic busts in mining, agriculture, and cattle raising. There would have been more time for Indians to adjust to a changing world.... The issue is not whether railroads should have been built. The issue is whether they should have been built when and where they were built. And to those questions the answer seems no. Quite literally, if the country had not built transcontinental railroads, it might not have needed them until much later, when it could have built them more cheaply, more efficiently, and with fewer social and political costs." (517)

White argues that history could have turned out differently. If the government had not thrown its largess at the railroads, the United States (and Mexico and Canada) would have been better off. Even the Indians would have been better off. His point is not that the transcontinentals should never have been built. Rather, he claims that if private enterprise had constructed them only when and where they could be justified by calculations of profitability untainted by subsidy, the United States would have been a kinder, gentler place in the late nineteenth century.

It might seem from this last phrase as if I am mocking White's argument, but that is not my intention. White is offering an explicitly counterfactual hypothesis that deserves to be taken seriously. All historical arguments by their very nature imply that history would have turned out differently if the events or factors singled out for emphasis did not occur. Unfortunately, most historians never even think about, let alone attempt to test, the alternative hypotheses that are implicit in their work. White should be applauded for posing his argument in explicit counterfactual terms. In my view, however, he does not take his own argument seriously enough. That is, he does not bring the evidence to bear on the counterfactual that is needed to go beyond the surface of plausibility and truly assess its utility for illuminating the history of the period.

The purpose of my commentary is to suggest how one might work through such an assessment. I first highlight the basic theoretical assumptions that structure White's narrative. I suggest that these assumptions are similar to those that underlie much current economic thinking and argue that a more explicit use of this framework could help to resolve puzzles that the book currently leaves hanging. The remainder of the commentary is devoted to demonstrating how some simple models can illuminate the economics of the transcontinentals and also their effects on American society more generally.

THE PROBLEM OF ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION

At the heart of White's narrative is a set of theoretical assumptions that are essentially the same as those that underpin what is often called the new economics of information/Practitioners reject neoclassical models that depend on the assumption that all economic actors have perfect knowledge of the choices they face.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Institute on California and the West Railroaded Workshop, Huntington Library, San Marino, CA, July 9, 2011: Taking Counterfactual History Seriously
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?