What Happened to the Human Mind after the Howiesons Poort?

By Lombard, Marlize; Parsons, Isabelle | Antiquity, December 2011 | Go to article overview

What Happened to the Human Mind after the Howiesons Poort?


Lombard, Marlize, Parsons, Isabelle, Antiquity


Introduction

Recently, Laurel Phillipson and Marlize Lombard published evidence for Middle Stone Age bow and arrow technology in southern Africa (Lombard & Phillipson 2010). Thanks to Antiquity, the paper was widely publicised, and Prof. Chris Stringer's contribution to the BBC press release once again highlighted one of the most pressing questions regarding human behavioural and cognitive evolution during the mid-late Upper Pleistocene (here used informally to demarcate the period between roughly 80 000 and 40 000 years ago). He saw the evidence for early bow and arrow technology as adding to the view that modern humans in Africa began to hunt in a new way by 64 000 years ago, and that it further extends the advanced behaviours inferred for early modern people of the continent. According to Stringer, the long gaps in the subsequent record of complex technologies such as the bow and arrow, however, remain perplexing (also see Villa et al. 2010: 640). It may mean that regular use of these weapons did not come until much later, and that the concept of bows and arrows may have been reinvented many millennia afterwards (Stringer pers. comm.).

Similar concerns have been raised by others, not only regarding mechanically projected weaponry, but also about behavioural and cognitive complexity in general. Consensus about whether cultural modernity originated in Africa, or had its roots in multiple continents still has to be reached (e.g. Conard 2010). Many researchers, nonetheless, now accept that human behaviour, associated with the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort stone tool industries between about 75 000 and 60 000 years ago in southern Africa (see Jacobs & Roberts 2008 for discussion on dating), was essentially 'modern', or cognitively and behaviourally complex (Lombard & Parsons 2010). We use 'modern' with caution mostly because it reflects original texts, and we cannot hope to translate the meaning accurately on behalf of others within the framework of current debate (see Shea 2011). In the context of our own discussion, we follow Hovers and Belfer-Cohen's (2006: 296) use of the term as: "relating to, or characteristic of, the present or the immediate past, with no a priori evolutionary connotations. According to this definition, modern behaviour is not necessarily unique to the present, and its presence in the past does not distract from its modernity".

Based on stone tool technology alone, the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort industries show remarkable sophistication, of a kind mostly associated previously with the Upper Palaeolithic in Eurasia, or the Later Stone Age in sub-Saharan Africa--roughly beginning between 50 000 and 40 000 years ago. Yet, stone tool assemblages immediately post-dating the Howiesons Poort (post-Howiesons Poort), between about 58 000 and 50 000 years ago, have been described as "reverting to type" (Deacon 1989: 560), "less sophisticated" (Jacobs & Roberts 2009: 191), and "returning to earlier technological strategies" (McCall 2007: 1749), reminiscent of assemblages pre-dating 75 000 years ago. This perception is predominantly based on early observations regarding the stone tool assemblage from a single site, Klasies River (Singer & Wymer 1982), and the seeming lack of unambiguous symbolic objects during the 10-20 millennia following the Howiesons Poort (see Mitchell 2008 for discussion). Potentially far-reaching explanations of significant episodes of simplification or devolution (Mellars 2007: 7), technological and/or behavioural reversal (McCall 2007: 1749), a material culture cul-de-sac (Henshilwood 2007: 130) or cultural regression (Henshilwood 2005: 455) have been proffered. These interpretations could contribute to views that people living in southern Africa were not behaviourally or cognitively 'fully modern' before about 50 000 years ago (Ambrose & Lorenz 1990; Klein 2001), or that the transition to 'modern human technology' was marked by the change from the Middle Stone Age to the Later Stone Age (e. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

What Happened to the Human Mind after the Howiesons Poort?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.