State Law Claims and Article III in Stern V. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011)

By Kovvali, Aneil | Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Winter 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

State Law Claims and Article III in Stern V. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011)


Kovvali, Aneil, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy


Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution vests "the judicial Power of the United States" in courts whose judges "shall hold their Offices during good Behavior." (1) Bankruptcy courts are presided over by judges who lack such life tenure (2) and so are unable to wield Article III judicial power. Almost three decades ago, in Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., (3) a splintered Supreme Court held that this limitation prevented a bankruptcy court from deciding a state-law contract claim. (4) Over the course of subsequent cases, the Court struggled to define the limits of Article III's prohibition, deploying an expanding set of factors to explain its rulings. (5) Last Term, in Stern v. Marshall, (6) the Supreme Court applied these factors to conclude that a bankruptcy court could not decide a state-law claim for tortious interference. (7) Although the Court insisted that the state-law origin of a claim lacked "talismanic power" (8) in the years between Northern Pipeline and Stern, the Stern majority rightly emphasized that factor in its analysis.

As the Court observed, the length and complexity of the litigation at issue in Stern approached Dickensian proportions. (9) Vickie Lynn Marshall (Vickie), also known as Anna Nicole Smith, was the widow of J. Howard Marshall II (J. Howard). (10) E. Pierce Marshall (Pierce) was J. Howard Marshall's son by a previous marriage. (11) Vickie's lawyers alleged--in court and to the press--that J. Howard intended for her to receive the gift of a catchall trust and that Pierce fraudulently sought to defeat that intention. (12) Pierce contended that these statements amounted to tortious defamation. (13)

While litigation over the estate continued in Texas Probate Court, Vickie filed for bankruptcy. (14) To ensure that he would be able to collect damages on his claims of tortious defamation, Pierce joined the bankruptcy proceedings by filing a proof of claim against the bankruptcy estate. (15) Vickie asserted truth as a defense and filed a counterclaim against Pierce for tortious interference with J. Howard's gift to her. (16) The bankruptcy court granted Vickie summary judgment and awarded her damages. (17)

Pierce argued that the bankruptcy court lacked the authority to enter judgment on Vickie's counterclaim, (18) Bankruptcy courts have statutory authority to enter final judgments in "core proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in a case under title 11." (19) Core proceedings are not explicitly defined, but they include "counterclaims by [a debtor's] estate against persons filing claims against the estate...." (20) By contrast, in non-core proceedings, bankruptcy courts simply make proposals to district courts; the Article III judges on the district courts then review the proposals and enter final judgment. (21) Pierce argued that Vickie's counterclaim was a non-core proceeding. (22) The bankruptcy court concluded that Vickie's counterclaim was a core proceeding, and that it thus had the power to enter judgment. (23)

The district court disagreed, concluding that Vickie's counterclaim for tortious interference was not a core proceeding. (24) Although the counterclaim fell within the literal statutory language describing core proceedings, the district court was concerned that such an expansive reading would unconstitutionally give judicial power to non-Article III bankruptcy judges. (25) To avoid this conclusion, the district court took a narrow view of "core proceeding" and held that Vickie's counterclaim was a non-core proceeding. (26) It thus regarded the bankruptcy court's conclusions as mere proposals. (27)

By this time, the Texas state court already had conducted a jury trial and found for Pierce. (28) But the federal district court denied preclusive effect to the state court judgment, finding instead for Vickie, and awarding her compensatory and punitive damages. (29)

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that the lower courts had lacked jurisdiction to hear the case because it fell within a "probate exception" to federal jurisdiction.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

State Law Claims and Article III in Stern V. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.