Limited Oversight: The Role of the Federal Courts Vis-a-Vis the Environmental Protection Agency in Air Pollution Control under the Clean Air Act

By Buente, David T., Jr.; Gerard, William E. et al. | Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Spring 2011 | Go to article overview

Limited Oversight: The Role of the Federal Courts Vis-a-Vis the Environmental Protection Agency in Air Pollution Control under the Clean Air Act


Buente, David T., Jr., Gerard, William E., Visser, Joel F., Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum


I. INTRODUCTION

In creating the modern environmental regulatory state, Congress assigned the primary responsibility for implementation of the statutes to federal and state regulators. (1) Environmental statutory schemes tend to provide only broad guidelines, and executive agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are expected to fill in the gaps through rulemakings, permit issuance, and enforcement actions. Given their technical expertise, the agencies are supposed to be well equipped to create detailed regulations that implement Congress's goal of a clean and healthy environment. This delegation of authority is significant because, in most cases, EPA and state regulators are given freedom to choose the content of environmental regulations. In the context of the Clean Air Act, the subject of this article, they choose what pollutants will be regulated, which sources of pollutants will be among the regulated entities, what standards will be imposed upon those regulated entities, the deadline by which those standards will be met, and, finally, whether or not the regulations will be enforced. (2)

In light of this broad delegation of authority, Congress plays a surprisingly small role in overseeing the content of EPA's regulations. Congress rarely takes legislative action in response to perceived inadequacies in EPA's regulatory approach. Instead, its oversight actions are largely limited to appropriations legislation and oversight hearings, which create no binding legal authority. (3) The role of federal oversight of EPA and other executive agencies has fallen on the judiciary. Under the Clean Air Act, federal courts are given authority to hear petitions challenging final agency actions such as rulemakings, petitions asserting that EPA has failed to undertake nondiscretionary duties such as regular review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and civil and criminal enforcement matters. Thus, with respect to virtually every aspect of agency action (or inaction) there is at least an opportunity to challenge EPA's regulatory decisions in federal court.

Although it is often taken for granted that the federal judiciary plays a substantial role in shaping environmental law, a closer examination reveals considerable variability based on the type of action that is before the court. Specifically, this article examines the significance of the federal judiciary's role in shaping environmental law by comparing the relative power of EPA and the courts under the various provisions for judicial oversight. The article finds that a federal court's power is at its apex when engaging in statutory interpretation of specific provisions of the Clean Air Act during challenges to final agency action under section 307. (4) From this high point, the federal judiciary's power is diminished as the standards of review become more deferential, the content of the courts' decisions becomes less substantive, and EPA retains additional authority to resolve disputes without judicial intervention.

In order to assess the judiciary's role in shaping environmental law, this article focuses on EPA action (or inaction) under the Clean Air Act. Under the Clean Air Act, EPA and the federal courts can interact in two primary ways: through suits challenging EPA's regulatory approach and through EPA enforcement actions alleging violations of the Act. With respect to each type of interaction, this article will articulate the legal basis for the judiciary's oversight role, a description of the content of those interactions, and, finally, an analysis of the significance of the federal judiciary's role in shaping the content of the Clean Air Act. Sections II and III of the article will address judicial review of citizens' suit petitions challenging final EPA action under section 307(b) (5) and allegations that EPA has failed to act to regulate under section 304(a)(2). (6) Section IV will address the federal judiciary's role in enforcement of the Clean Air Act. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Limited Oversight: The Role of the Federal Courts Vis-a-Vis the Environmental Protection Agency in Air Pollution Control under the Clean Air Act
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.