Win Not Always Gain in Tally for Delegates; State Systems Keep Count Fluid

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), February 16, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Win Not Always Gain in Tally for Delegates; State Systems Keep Count Fluid

Byline: Seth McLaughlin, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Pay no attention to those projected delegate counts you've seen.

Though tallies show that former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is ahead of his GOP rivals in the race to capture the 1,144 delegates needed to sew up the party's presidential nomination, they are misleading.

They don't account for the pool of 180 delegates that have yet to be doled out by Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Colorado and Maine, all of which have voted - opening the door for a reshuffling of the leader boardin the coming months.

I believe all those delegates are in play, said Saul Anuzis, former head of the Michigan Republican Party and candidate for Republican National Committee chairman. So, it's anyone's ballgame in those states.

In other words, the old mantra a win's a win is hard to apply to the nomination race because a win carries different meanings among states - thanks to a complex web of rules governing the allocation of delegates to the national convention in Tampa, Fla., where the party will formally nominate its candidate in August.

Former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, for instance, has won four contests but officially has just three delegates committed to vote for him in Tampa. Those three came from his last-place finish in Nevada.

Mr. Romney's four wins translated into 73 delegates, and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas raked in eight delegates without notching a single victory. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich secured 29 delegates, largely from his victory in the South Carolina primary, and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. took two delegates out of New Hampshire, then exited the race.

The murkiness of the delegate count is tied to differences in states that award delegates immediately and those that don't.

New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida and Nevada handed out 115 delegates. Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Colorado and Maine - the first four of which were won by Mr. Santorum and the last by Mr. Romney - didn't provide any of their 180 delegates. Instead, four of those states kicked off multistep processes that will determine delegates. Missouri will jump-start a similar process next month.

The caucus vote is simply a preference poll. It is nonbinding, and in many cases it doesn't directly correlate to the election of delegates, said Ryan Call, chairman of the Republican Party of Colorado.

At caucuses there, voters picked people to attend district and state party gatherings in April, when 33 delegates will be decided. Under state party rules, the delegation also will include the national committeeman, the national committeewoman and the state party chairman.

This is the first step in a multistep process, and it's routine that the delegates as they move their way along this process re-evaluate the current field and ultimately select a slate of delegates that is reflective of the changing dynamic of this race, Mr.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Win Not Always Gain in Tally for Delegates; State Systems Keep Count Fluid


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?