Throttling Dissent from Global-Warming Orthodoxy

By Hoar, William P. | The New American, February 20, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Throttling Dissent from Global-Warming Orthodoxy


Hoar, William P., The New American


Item: I he website for the WWF--the World Wide Fund for Nature, formerly called the World Wildlife Fund--calls climate change (or global warming, terms it uses interchangeably) one of uthe biggest threats to humanity and nature" It is, avers WWF,

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

  nearly impossible to overstate the threat of climate
  change. Greenhouse gas emissions are rising more
  rapidly than predicted and the world is warming more
  quickly in response. Global warming will have
  catastrophic effects such as accelerating sea level
  rise, droughts, floods, storms and heat waves. These
  will impact some of the world's poorest and most
  vulnerable people, disrupting food production, and
  threatening vitally important species, habitats and
  ecosystems.

Item: USA Today for January 16, 2012, in a piece entitled "Science educators take on climate naysayers" reports: "The National Center for Science Education [NCSEJ, based in Oakland, California, is best known for leading charges against creationist efforts to remove evolution from public schools nationwide. But now, the three-decade-old group will also fight efforts to slip incorrect climate science information into school lessons." Item: In an article called "Climate change skepticism seeps into science classroom" the Los Angeles Times reports on January 16 that there has been "mounting resistance to the study of man-made climate change in middle and high schools." The Times went on to say: "Although scientific evidence increasingly shows that fossil fuel consumption has caused the climate to change rapidly, the issue has grown so politicized that skepticism of the broad scientific consensus has seeped into classrooms."

The NCSE, a "watchdog group that supports the teaching of evolution through advocacy and educational materials," is beginning an "initiative to monitor the teaching of climate science and evaluate the sources of resistance to it."

Correction: You might think that someone who purported to be pro-science would want to hear all relevant evidence--not just assertions pushed by lobbyists seeking to use force to shut up one's opponents in the public arena. But when one is in the propaganda business, it does matter what is planted in the mind of youngsters, and it also helps if evidence to the contrary can be excluded.

When it comes to the crusade involving climate change--the current euphemism of choice, since "global warming" seems to have lost its allure--there is a pincer movement. On the one hand, the object is to create panic: A fright campaign is used to justify extreme government action lest there be a worldwide disaster. On the other hand, there is an attempt to control what is taught, with the curricula in schools being used as a straitjacket to control the issue.

Anyone who really believes that a left-wing advocacy outfit such as NCSE doesn't support big-government "solutions" in the war against certain types of energy production is terminally naive.

Slanted press coverage also helps to color claims. Last year, there was a lot of hype by the warming crowd over the release of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) study, which reported that the temperature of the Earth has risen 1 degree Celsius since 1950. But even the project manager (who supports the theory of global warming) acknowledged the limitations of the study. Berkeley Professor Richard Muller was begrudgingiy honest enoueh to admit that the land-based "tern-perature station quality is largely awful."

The project director also pointed out: "A careful survey of these stations by a team led by meteorologist Anthony Watts showed that 70% of these stations have such poor siting that, by the U.S. government's own measure, they result in temperature uncertainties of between two and five degrees Celsius or more. We do not know how much worse are the stations in the developing world." Muller went on to note: "The margin of error for the stations is at least three times larger than the estimated warming.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Throttling Dissent from Global-Warming Orthodoxy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?