Soilscapes and Settlements: Remote Mapping of Activity Areas in Unexcavated Prehistoric Farmsteads

By Salisbury, Roderick B. | Antiquity, March 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Soilscapes and Settlements: Remote Mapping of Activity Areas in Unexcavated Prehistoric Farmsteads


Salisbury, Roderick B., Antiquity


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Introduction

With every new methodological or theoretical development, archaeologists are confronted with new opportunities, and quite often with problems they had not imagined. In mitigation archaeology, financial pressure demands a rapid response at high resolution over large areas, but the results are often uneven and tend to be dominated by the visually obvious large-scale sites. But archaeologists are now aware that many smaller settlements existed contemporary to the larger centres, and that what went on in the 'hinterland' played an important role in the development of prehistoric communities. A recent example of a study that treats smaller settlements as analytical units for understanding social change is by Liu (2004), who brings together environmental factors, agency, spatial organisation and the social relations of Longshan farmers to reconstruct developmental trajectories of early state formation in Neolithic China. Similar work may be found in the archaeology of Mississippian societies (Pauketat 2003), and Balkansky's (2006) summation of large-scale survey in Mesoamerica. The dynamics of small-scale societies in the ancient Near East, focusing on local scales of analysis in relation to the rise of socio-economic complexity, are presented in a recent collection of papers edited by Bolger & Maguire (2010).

Archaeologists wishing to tackle these issues are confronted with several obstacles. First, archaeological knowledge and skills are typically honed on large sites. While the wealth of data that comes from such excavations does not need to be recited here, it is definitely the case that learning the proper techniques for excavating a 15m-high settlement mound does not prepare one for making sense of a landscape of 100 small farmsteads. Yet understanding the interdependence of multiple communities is essential for understanding the complexities of social change. The volume of information that is coming from regional-scale survey, satellite imagery, mechanised ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and other prospection conducted at the level of whole landscapes can be overwhelming, leading to a second obstacle; we do not have formalised plans for investigating hundreds of sites effectively in terms of time, money and other resources.

One solution to these problems is to investigate the occupied landscape through the concept of cultural 'soilscapes'. These are defined as "a given area of the Earth's surface that is the result of spatially and temporally variable geomorphic, pedogenic and cultural processes" (Wells 2006: 125). That is, the cultural soilscape is a piece of landscape that has been formed or affected by human activity. At the local scale, the soils surrounding the village forma local soilscape, one that is altered by everyday practices. The soilscape concept differs from the anthrosols concept in that the cultural soilscape encompasses human activity at the scale of the local landscape, whilst anthrosols exhibit change at a much smaller scale (Wells 2006: 126). Soilscapes can influence concepts of identity and community by demarcating traditional places for tasks or interactions, as well as through the sense of belonging that shared place can provide.

Soil is both an archaeological resource and a structuring element for agrarian societies. Treating soil as material culture discovers interactions between people and soil, addressing the ways that everyday practices alter the soil and are in turn influenced by the soil (Boivin & Owoc 2004; Owoc 2005; Salisbury 2010). Sediments are the largest class of material remains at archaeological sites, yet soil is more than just a by-product of site formation. We have not only the intended action, perhaps clearing off some space on a retrace along a boggy river meander, building a house of wattle and daub, and cultivating a garden plot, but also the unintended effects. The visual appearance and tactile sensation of the soil is transformed.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Soilscapes and Settlements: Remote Mapping of Activity Areas in Unexcavated Prehistoric Farmsteads
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?