Court Upholds Affirmative-Action Ban in California; Rules on University Admissions

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 3, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Court Upholds Affirmative-Action Ban in California; Rules on University Admissions

Byline: Valerie Richardson, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

A federal appeals court on Monday rejected a bid by minority students to overturn California's ban on affirmative action in admissions to state colleges and universities, saying the 1996 initiative approved by California voters already had passed the court's legal muster.

Ralph Kasarda, an attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation, said that today's ruling is good news for everyone who values fairness and equal opportunity.

If the people who brought this lawsuit are genuinely opposed to discrimination in university admissions, as they claim, they should be supporting Proposition 209 and its crystal-clear ban on discriminatory policies, not trying to tear them down, Mr. Kasarda said.

The lawsuit, filed by the liberal group By Any Means Necessary on behalf of more than 40 black and Hispanic students, argued that the court should revisit its 1997 decision upholding the law because 15 years in effect shows discrimination against minority students.

The group argued that black,Hispanic and American Indian students from high school programs that offer insufficient preparation cannot compete effectively for University of California system slots.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed unanimously. It ruled that the earlier court decision considered the very scenario Plaintiffs now allege of declining minority enrollment, and thus there is no new case against Proposition 209.

The bottom line is that Wilson II remains the law of the circuit, and the district court faithfully applied it, the three judges ruled.

Donna Stern, By Any Means Necessary's national coordinator, said the group would file to have the case heard by the entire court. The organization is working to build popular support for affirmative action through protests and public-education events, she said.

Obviously, we wish it had gone the other way, Ms. Stern said. Really, in order to win these cases, it's going to take a mass movement, including occupations and sit-downs, demanding that admissions procedures and policies change to provide opportunity for Latino, African-American and Native American students.

The lawsuit was filed against Calfledifornia Gov. Jerry Brown and the University of California, but Mr. Brown refused to defend Proposition 209, siding with those filing the lawsuit. The initiative was represented instead by the Pacific Legal Foundation and the University of California system's attorneys.

He not only refused to defend [Proposition 209], he filed against it, Mr. Kasarda said. If the government doesn't defend the law, it should be very concerning to citizens.

Mr. Brown also has refused to defend in court another voter-approved initiative, Proposition 8, the measure against same-sex marriage, which has been represented by

Proposition 209, sponsored by Ward Connerly, a former University of California regent, prohibits public universities from considering sex, race or ethnicity in their admissions decisions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Court Upholds Affirmative-Action Ban in California; Rules on University Admissions


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?