Adopting Ohio Senate Bill 5: The Role of the Public University Presidents

By Gelman, Sheldon | Albany Law Review, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview

Adopting Ohio Senate Bill 5: The Role of the Public University Presidents


Gelman, Sheldon, Albany Law Review


The legislature is expected to address pension reform early. Language is being developed and not yet available; major changes ... are being discussed [by Ohio's political leadership--changes that will require employees pay a portion of the employers' contributions]. This will likely be a major issue for faculty and staff. There may be opportunities for universities as employers to save money, but it will come out of the wallets of employees ... The Ohio and regional chambers of commerce has issued a report that recognizes the advantages of defined benefit [pension] plans and a retire/rehire policy [that allows senior university administrators to simultaneously receive a full pension and their full salary] ... (1)

I. INTRODUCTION

In March 2011 the Ohio General Assembly passed Senate Bill Five ("S.B. 5"), a measure that would have banned collective bargaining by public university faculty members and severely limited bargaining rights for other public employees. (2) Ohio voters decisively rejected S.B. 5 in a referendum election eight months later, preventing it from taking effect. (3) In response to public records requests I have received thousands of pages of documents that describe the role of public university presidents in connection with S.B. 5. Based on this newly available information, this article examines the actions, and analyzes the arguments, of senior university officials.

Together with similar collective bargaining legislation in Wisconsin, S.B. 5 triggered a national debate about labor policy and the role of the middle class in American life. (4) Besides those general concerns, however, the events hold special significance for our understanding of universities. S.B. 5 singled out university faculty for the most stringent treatment of any group and it did so via a provision--known as the "Yeshiva amendment"--that Ohio's public university presidents drafted and promoted in secret. (5)

The original version of S.B. 5 would have eliminated collective bargaining for public employees in Ohio, including employees of the state's public universities. (6) In late February 2011 legislative leaders substituted an amended bill, one that reinstated bargaining but limited its permissible subjects and effectively allowed public employing bodies to impose their own last offers at the end of process with no further recourse by employees. (7) The Yeshiva amendment further amended the bill by reclassifying university faculty as managers who were ineligible for bargaining, provided only that the faculty participated in curricular, faculty hiring, or similar decisions. (8) Since every university faculty member does those things, the amendment effectively banned bargaining by faculty. (9) The amendment took its name from NLRB v. Yeshiva University, a United States Supreme Court decision holding that private university professors qualified as "[s]upervisors and managerial employees" under the National Labor Relations Act and were therefore excluded by the Act from collective bargaining. (10)

Ohio's university presidents effectively replaced traditional conceptions of the university, the faculty, and the administration with a standard labor law model, one restricted to the categories management and employees--both of which operate under presidential direction. (11) The presidents did so, I argue, in an effort to transform higher education institutions into what Benjamin Ginsberg calls "the all-administrative university." (12) Consistent with that view, the presidents identified their institutions with themselves, equating presidential authority with institutional freedom and creativity. (13)

This article has four parts. First, it chronicles the presidents' actions, which they took pains to conceal from public view. The presidents acted through the agency of the Inter-University Council ("IUC") of Ohio, a statewide association of public university administrations that represented the presidents in extended discussions with the Governor's office and legislators. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Adopting Ohio Senate Bill 5: The Role of the Public University Presidents
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.