Credit Bidding Goes to Washington: Supreme Court Justices Weighing RadLAX Case

By Shappell, Brian | Business Credit, May 2012 | Go to article overview

Credit Bidding Goes to Washington: Supreme Court Justices Weighing RadLAX Case


Shappell, Brian, Business Credit


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The U.S. Supreme Court takes on a limited number of cases per year, and those relating directly to the credit profession and bankruptcy activity make up only a minute portion of those annually slated. This year, a key case regarding protocol in a bankruptcy asset auction conducted as part of a plan of reorganization, RadLAX Gateway Hotel LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, found its way onto the schedule for April 23 arguments with a decision to follow by the summer. At stake is whether secured creditors have an absolute right to bid the value of debt owed to them by a debtor selling assets at auction, when the sale is part of a plan of reorganization, a process called credit bidding, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled. However, that view is at odds with contrary decisions by the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Third and Fifth Circuits, which preceded it. Those held that the right to credit bid may not be available to secured creditors under certain circumstances if the assets are sold as part of a plan of reorganization.

"In the bankruptcy world, this case is very important because the Supreme Court takes so few bankruptcy cases in a year," said Eric Brunstad, law professor at Yale University and partner at Dechert LLR "What it writes about bankruptcy law and how it works is very important because it impacts how things are administered generally, particularly in a Chapter 11 case. A case like this is very important. Having the case in question clear up a gray area makes it that much more critical. It's always good to know what the rules of the game are. If we get clarity on the rules, it helps the bankruptcy process work more efficiently."

It's not surprising the high court's justices have to officiate contrary opinions out of the Seventh, Third and Fifth circuits--NACM's go-to legal experts don't even necessarily agree on the topic. One camp believes that credit bidding within an auction process helps facilitate other bidding, thus driving up the price and providing for a bigger pot for creditors-unsecured and secured alike--to draw from at plan confirmation time. Wanda Borges, Esq. of Borges and Associates LLP has recounted instances where, without a credit bid, the assets would have sold for a fraction of what became the final price, leaving unsecured suppliers and vendors literally with nothing. However, there's the flip side that believes if too much is owed to a secured creator, it essentially freezes out outside bidders and those with lower standing. Bruce Nathan, Esq. of Lowenstein Sandier PC holds that not forcing secured creditors to put up cash in such scenarios can discourage competitive bids and prevent a "robust" auction process.

RadLAX Gateway Hotel LLC v. Amalgamated Bank

In RadLax, the Seventh Circuit allowed a secured creditor the right to bid its claim, in other words, the amount of debt owed, in lieu of a cash bid as part of a plan confirmation process. The practice of credit bidding has been in play for quite some time in the bankruptcy process, generally, and was rarely challenged when made as part of the plan process. On the surface, the decision may not have generated much debate or discussion. However, because RadLAX followed two other cases that denied secured creditors the right to credit bid on assets sold as part of the plan process, the high court found it necessary to clear up the conflict.

The Third Circuit decision in Delaware came in the bankruptcy case of Philadelphia Newspapers LLC. In that case, a three-judge panel denied a creditor group's attempt to credit bid in the sale of the company as part of the plan process. The debtor was the operator of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News, and owed the bidders a significant amount of money. The Third Circuit's ruling resulted in a new auction. However, the circuit ruled the tactic would not be allowed and forced a auction. The group in question eventually did gain control of the assets, but only after it pledged its own cash during the new auction set by the judge. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Credit Bidding Goes to Washington: Supreme Court Justices Weighing RadLAX Case
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.