The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota Program in Florida: Perceptions and Implications

By Alsharif, Kamal; Miller, Nathan | Southeastern Geographer, Spring 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota Program in Florida: Perceptions and Implications

Alsharif, Kamal, Miller, Nathan, Southeastern Geographer

The Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery began management under an individual fishing quota (IFQ) system in January 2007. The expectation is that direct ownership stakes by fishers would bring greater involvement on behalf of the boat owners and fishers and more responsible and sustainable fishing practices for a depressed fish population. Online and phone surveys of fishers involved in the Florida red snapper fishery were performed to gauge their responses to this change in management policy. In addition, red snapper prices were evaluated before and after the IFQ system. Contrary to opinions published by IFQ supporters, our survey found that most fishers disapproved of the IFQ design process overall and generally distrusted fishery management. Although the suggestion by many of the survey respondents to restrict ownership of IFQ shares strictly to active working fishers may seem extreme, such regulation may be appropriate. In addition, the available ex-vessel price data for red snapper indicate a 10 percent increase in the price that fishers receive for their catch.

La pesca de huachinango (pargo rojo) del Golfo de Mexico comenzo operaciones bajo un sistema individual de cuota pesquera (IFQ) en enero de 2007. La expectativa es que la participacion directa en la propiedad por parte de los pescadores llevaria mayor participacion por parte de los duenos de barcos y de los pescadores, asi como practicas de pesca mas responsables y sostenibles concernientes a una poblacion de peces deprimida. Encuestas en linea y por telefono a pescadores involucrados en la pesca del huachinaugo de Florida se realizaron para medir sus respuestas a este cambio en la politica de manejo. Ademas, los precios del huachinango se evaluaron antes y despues del sistema IFQ. Contrario a opiniones publicadas por los partidarios del IFQ, nuestra encuesta descubrio que la mayoria de los pescadores desaprobaron el proceso de diseno del IFQ y generalmente desconfiaron de su manejo pesquero. Aunque la sugerencia de muchos de los participantes de la encuesta para restringir la propiedad de las cuotas del IFQ a solamente los pescadores activos puede ser vista como extrema, tal regulacion puede ser apropiada. Ademas, los datos disponibles sobre los precios del muelle para el huachinaugo indican un aumento de diez por ciento en el precio que los pescadores reciben por sus pescas.

KEY WORDS: Individual Fishing Quota, Red Snapper, Gulf of Mexico, Fish Management

PALABRAS CLAVES: Cupo Individual de Pesca, Huachinango, Golfo de Mexico, Manejo Pesquero


In 1996, an Individual Fishing Quota program (IFQ) was instituted in the Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery and was scheduled to begin in April of that year. IFQs are methods of fishery management in which ownership of specific, guaranteed amounts of the allotted fleet-wide quota are spread among individual users. In addition, the IFQ program is a market based fisheries management system that allows the corporation as well as individuals to harvest a certain number of the total allowable catch (TAC) (Criddle and Macinko 2000; NMFS 2009a). However, in reauthorizing the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, now referred to as the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA), Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska introduced a rider to the bill, which restricted the development of any new IFQs in the United States until more research was conducted. Thus, the red snapper fishery continued operating as it had been, with more boats than necessary to harvest red snapper in an efficient manner (Keithly, Jr. 2001). In 2006, the IFQ system was finally applied to the management of the red snapper fishery.

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) calls for the continuing collection of socio-economic data, in particular occupational satisfaction, including fishers' attitudes and perceptions of management, and views of their personal future in the industry (Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) 2006).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota Program in Florida: Perceptions and Implications


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?