No Quick Fix for Egypt: As Egypt Prepares for Its 'First' Post-Arab Spring Elections, It Becomes Increasingly Clear That the Path to True Democracy Is Likely to Be a Rocky One. Maria Golia Writes from Cairo

By Golia, Maria | The Middle East, May 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

No Quick Fix for Egypt: As Egypt Prepares for Its 'First' Post-Arab Spring Elections, It Becomes Increasingly Clear That the Path to True Democracy Is Likely to Be a Rocky One. Maria Golia Writes from Cairo


Golia, Maria, The Middle East


In the run-up to their first open presidential elections (scheduled for 23 May) Egyptians seem more confused than excited. "How am I supposed to choose [a candidate] if I don't know his plans for national development?" asks a washing-machine repair man. "We need a strongman. Egyptians only work for someone they fear," according to a downtown Cairo shop owner. "Whoever can make our streets safe again, I'll vote for him," says a taxi driver, referencing the car-jacking and other crimes that have grown more frequent in the last year.

The voters' task is complicated, not least because the drafting of a new constitution is stalled due to a lack of parliamentary consensus (regarding who should write it). Presidential powers and responsibilities, and the contract between people and state have yet to be defined.

Twenty-three candidates claimed to have secured the necessary public and parliamentary endorsements, but with less than a month before elections, questions of eligibility remain. Ten contenders were disqualified in mid April, including three popular ones, sparking heated controversy and inspiring one of the largest demonstrations Egypt has seen in months.

A leader of the ultra-conservative Salafist Nour Party, Hazem Abu Ismail, was dropped when his (Egyptian) mother was accused of having a Green Card and/or holding dual American citizenship. As Abu Ismail is a vocal critic of American secular politics and culture, the nature of his disqualification added insult to injury. His supporters claim the accusation was merely a move to undermine his growing popularity, but it has a legal basis.

According to a recent constitutional amendment, presidential candidates may not hold dual nationalities, nor can their wives or mothers be foreigners or possess foreign passports. Many objected when this amendment was ratified by public referendum last March. Of course, Egypt's president should be an Egyptian citizen, but why be obliged to marry an Egyptian? Those who disapproved the amendment's parochialism nonetheless found it convenient when it took a hard-line advocate of Shariah law out of the presidential race.

Egypt's Presidential Election Committee also disqualified Mubarak's long-serving chief of military intelligence, Omar Suleiman, whose candidacy enraged supporters of the revolution. Suleiman was nonetheless popular among those nostalgic for the so-called 'stability' of the Mubarak era, and fear Egypt's shift to a religious state. Tellingly, Suleiman was not eliminated because of his affiliation with the ousted regime or for fostering its most reprehensible aspects (including arbitrary arrests and torture) but because his endorsements, on careful recounting, fell slightly short of the required amount.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The third popular candidate, a Muslim Brothers' leader Khaled Al Shater, was disqualified because he had served a jail sentence. Supporters argued that his imprisonment by Mubarak for belonging to the then banned religious group only underlined Al Shater's validity. The political arm of the Brothers, the Freedom and Justice Party, swiftly replaced Al Shater with the lesser-known Mohammed Mursi. Although they dominate Parliament and are the most organised political group, the FJP has lost credibility in the scuffle. For a year it promised not to field a candidate at all so as to prove that unlike the former regime, it was here to serve Egypt, not control it.

Some feel that the elimination of these three contenders was 'a blessing', since each had a significant number of followers and represented an agenda that would be unlikely to lead Egypt forward. The question is, who can, and what have voters got to go on?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

No Quick Fix for Egypt: As Egypt Prepares for Its 'First' Post-Arab Spring Elections, It Becomes Increasingly Clear That the Path to True Democracy Is Likely to Be a Rocky One. Maria Golia Writes from Cairo
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?