The Time Is Now Right to Split Church and State

The Evening Standard (London, England), June 13, 2012 | Go to article overview

The Time Is Now Right to Split Church and State


Byline: ?Douglas Carswell

[bar] AY marriage, it is darkly hinted, would spell the end. The final breach. The thing that finally tears the English Church and State asunder. Legalising marriage between same-sex couples would -- whisper it gently -- provoke the disestablishment of the Church of England. No more -- horror of horrors -- would Anglicanism be our official state religion.

Oh, please! I can think of many sensible arguments both for and against gay marriage. But the idea that we should oppose it for fear it would mean the disestablishment of the Church of England is not one of them. Indeed, it is the one line of argument guaranteed to make me sympathetic to Lynne Featherstone, the minister responsible for this gay marriage muddle.

Anti-disestablishmentarianism -- the idea that we should not strip the Anglican Church of its official status -- is not only the longest word in the English language, it has also given rise to one of the longest running debates in the English language, too.

"Leave it alone" has been the default argument of defenders of the Anglican Church's privileged position for the past 150 years. "Detach this one delicate thread from the constitutional tapestry" they cry "and the entire thing might come apart."

Having an official church, the traditionalists tell us, with whom Her Majesty is "in communion" as Supreme Governor, is the foundation upon which our monarchy rests. Tinker with the Act of Settlement of 1701, and we will become just another tinpot republic before you can say "written constitution".

Nonsense. Since 1688, the monarch has been our head of state not because of the Divine Right of Kings, nor because the English realm has been some sort of family heirloom. The monarch has been the monarch because Parliament says so.

The popular, deep-felt affection for the monarchy that we saw on display in London last week came not some ancient legal parchment but from the people.

An ardent monarchist, who also wants to see the Church of England thrive, I believe that disestablishing the Church of England would set Anglicanism free.

Why, I wonder, do so many of the political Right cling to the idea that the Anglican Church should remain our state-backed religion? We conservatives are, as a rule, against nationalisation. It generates complacency and inefficiency.

So why do we back a nationalised Church? If the State is useless at running airlines or telephone lines, why do we accept that it is any better at running the Church of England? I want the Church of England to break free from the State precisely because I want to see it prosper and thrive. Like the state-run industries in the 1970s, the Church of England has suffered from falling market share. It has expensive and costly overheads. It has failed to innovate, with sometimes complacent senior management. It has at times been in danger of losing touch with its customer base.

Though it is never wise to generalise about either America or religion, I cannot help but notice each time I have visited the US how churches over there seem to thrive. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Time Is Now Right to Split Church and State
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.