State's Forestry Tax System Works for All of Us

The Register Guard (Eugene, OR), June 21, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

State's Forestry Tax System Works for All of Us


Byline: GUEST VIEWPOINT By Brenda Woodard

As a native Oregonian and co-owner, with my husband, of 400 acres of family forestland in Lane and Douglas counties, I was offended by Tim Hermach's June 14 column blasting the timber industry and just about everyone else. Like many Oregonians, I want to see a balance between economic opportunity and environmental protection rather than anti-business and anti- forestry rhetoric.

The Legislature enacted the Oregon Forest Practices Act in 1971, the first statewide forest protection act of its kind. The act was part of a bundle of bills passed in the late 1960s and early '70s that define us as Oregonians: the Beach Bill in 1967, the Bottle Bill in 1971 and the Land Conservation and Development Act in 1973.

The act protects forestland and natural resources. Oregon's unique system of land use laws protects forestland from being developed for residences or businesses. That keeps the land forested, which is good for fish, wildlife and water quality. It also keeps forestland values low, which makes it affordable to own, invest in and manage - which is why Oregon boasts 65,000 family forestland owners like myself.

Setting aside for the moment the issue of the former Oregon & California Railroad lands, Hermach made sweeping, unfounded claims against Oregon's system of taxation and forest practice laws. I believe our laws protect Oregon's private forests from development while protecting our natural resources.

In 1977, the Legislature recognized that, much like farmers, private forest landowners were managing trees they planted themselves. We make investments in the land and forests that are not recouped for 40 years or more, provided the trees aren't destroyed by fire, wind, insects or disease.

To encourage investments and stewardship, lawmakers changed the method of taxing forestland and timber harvest. Lawmakers eliminated the ad valorem tax on live trees, but continued to assess a property tax that is based on the forestland's productivity.

When trees are cut and sold, income is generated and that income is taxed. In addition, a harvest tax is levied that supports forestry research, administration of the act, fire protection and public education about forestry.

Because there is not an annual income stream from each acre of forestland, such land is generally assessed at less than agricultural land and a lot less than land that can be developed into homes or businesses.

Oregon isn't alone in that approach. Forestland owners in California, Washington and Idaho also pay property tax on the land, but not on the trees - as long as they still are standing.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

State's Forestry Tax System Works for All of Us
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?