Myths of Nature Cloud Our Thinking

The Register Guard (Eugene, OR), June 24, 2012 | Go to article overview

Myths of Nature Cloud Our Thinking


Byline: Tom Giesen For The Register-Guard

The Oregon Coast Range is mostly unbroken forest, laced with streams and roads. Most roads are gravel; many are ungated. People live only along the edges of the forest and on major routes: it is a province where humans come and go, but don't stay.

It isn't raw wilderness out there; most has been roaded and logged - some several times. But it is a wilder place than where I sleep. Bear, cougar, coyote, bobcat, elk and deer live there. I love to be there as well.

Oregon is gradations of wildness, from hyper-urban to designated wilderness. We tend to speak of wilderness as nature, and hyper-urban as not-nature - the Oregon Coast Range falls between the two.

But if wilderness is nature, is where I live not nature? Is nature the absence of humans or of human-wrought changes? Are nature and humans incompatible? What is nature? If something isn't nature, what is it?

We use the word nature in many ways. Some speak as if "mother nature" is in control of the biological and physical world, and that "mother nature" will fix things if we mess them up. We say, "Don't mess with mother nature" as a warning about nature's power, and we say, "Nature bats last" as a way of saying that some form of natural processes will be around (even if we aren't) after, say, a global nuclear war. Nature feels powerful to us.

A different view is that nature is simply natural things - unaltered landscapes. Nature seems natural, whereas our urban world doesn't. We think nature is a beautiful place, even if it is sometimes scary.

Nature can also be the locus of conflict when natural places are disrupted or degraded. Activities that turn nature into commodities (two-by-fours, crushed rock, water diverted from rivers) are sometimes disputed and opposed.

Humans are seldom spoken of as part of nature. There seems to be a human-nature dichotomy, perhaps with religious roots. Some folks find that humans alone have some supernatural aspects (a soul, immortality).

My Oxford American Desk Dictionary defines nature as "the natural world." Common usage suggests that nature is something relatively undisturbed by humans - something "natural."

I argue instead that nature is our total biological and physical environment - including humans. I argue that everything on or in the planet, or in the universe, is nature. Humans evolved within and are part of nature. Simply put, nature is everything of which humans are aware.

Wild places are nature - but cities are nature, too. Everything in cities is fashioned from nature. The energy to power cities is derived from natural sources - the sun, stored hydrocarbons, nuclear power, etc. This transformation of nature by humans is made possible by natural energy and natural materials.

There are many myths about nature - here are a few of them:

Nature is wild places unaltered by humans. But there are no such places left on the planet. Every place has been altered by human activity; we are even changing our climate.

Wild places are scary, sometimes terrifying. To imagine being killed by a carnivore - say, a cougar - can produce an overwhelming fear which keeps many people out of wild places. But I can find no modern reports of a human killed by a cougar in Oregon. In contrast, in Oregon, almost 300 people were killed in automobile accidents in 2010. Civilization is a brutal, gory place! But the fear of wild places, as of cougars, encourages the myth that natural places are always perilous and civilization is always safe. If wild places are terrifying, we want to fix them, to civilize nature and remove the wildness. In this way, just the idea of scary things in the wild seems to justify the destruction of wild places.

Nature is inexhaustible. Some economists believe that if any resources become scarce, we will find adequate and inexpensive substitutes. But there is no evidence for that - it is a faith-based belief. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Myths of Nature Cloud Our Thinking
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.