Obama and Romney Should Debate Lincoln-Douglas-Style; Less Restricted Format Would Sharpen the Contrast
Byline: Michael Taube, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The presidential and vice-presidential debates will be held in October. While political observers and enthusiasts look forward to this, many Americans view the debates as the bane of their existence.
Modern political debates rely heavily on scripted questions and short buzz clips designed to upset an opponent's demeanor. Language and prose are no longer important tools. It's simply a matter of who can generate the most meaningful attack for the evening news. That's why people switch the TV channel so often during presidential debates or don't watch them at all.
However, there's a ray of hope. Last week, the Commission on Presidential Debates announced a major change to the debate format. According to Washington Times reporter David Hill, three of its four debates this October will include time blocks of as long as 15 minutes during which candidates will debate a single topic. This is an exciting development because the new format hopefully will encourage each presidential candidate to provide well-thought-out answers to difficult questions. For the first time in a long time, intellectual discourse will replace buzz clips at a presidential debate.
That being said, I think President Obama and Mitt Romney should go one step further. My suggestion is to make the fourth presidential debate in the style of the famous series of debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas. There would be no panelists, media questions, or YouTube video clips. Instead, the two participants would debate, in Douglas' words, for the purpose of discussing the leading political topics which now agitate the public mind.
Here's some background. In 1858, Lincoln and Douglas agreed to have seven debates while competing for an Illinois Senate seat. The first candidate spoke for an hour, the second candidate spoke for 11/2 hours, and the first candidate finished the session with a thirty-minute rebuttal. The two men alternated the task of speaking first, with Douglas, the incumbent, getting the honor in four debates.
The Lincoln-Douglas debates focused primarily on one important historical issue, slavery. Each man's speeches were topical, and often witty and brilliant. But as the historian Allen C. Guelzo correctly pointed out, We have been so content to take the Lincoln-Douglas debates as a purely historical event that we miss how much the great debates really are a defining moment in the development of a liberal democracy.
Douglas, the Democrat, favored the right of states to own …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Obama and Romney Should Debate Lincoln-Douglas-Style; Less Restricted Format Would Sharpen the Contrast. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Washington Times (Washington, DC). Publication date: August 6, 2012. Page number: B01. © 2009 The Washington Times LLC. COPYRIGHT 2012 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.