Good Faith, Bad Faith, but Not Losing Faith: A Commentary on the 2010 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration

By Martinez-Fraga, Pedro J. | Georgetown Journal of International Law, Winter 2012 | Go to article overview

Good Faith, Bad Faith, but Not Losing Faith: A Commentary on the 2010 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration


Martinez-Fraga, Pedro J., Georgetown Journal of International Law


TABLE OF CONTENTS  I.     INTRODUCTION  II.    CONSULTATION AND SELF-DISCLOSURE IN ARTICLE 2:        HARMONIZING TRADITIONS AND THE APPLICATION OF PERSUASIVE        AUTHORITY        A. Article 2 of the Rules and the Effort to Strike a Balance        B. The Influence of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure  III.   REVISITING STANDARDS AND DEFINITIONS: AN INQUIRY INTO        MEANING AND CONSISTENCY IN THE NEW IDA RULES        A. The "Relevant to the Case and Material to its Outcome"           Standard        B. The Need for Further Definition: "Relevance" and           "Materiality"  IV.    A NEW STANDARD OF GOOD FAITH: AT LEAST A GOOD FAITH        EFFORT TOWARDS h STANDARD        A. Introducing (and Interpreting) Good Faith        B. ReliaStar and the Rules' Good Faith Requirement: Twins or           Perhaps Strangers  IV.    REVISITING THE INHERENT AUTHORITY OF ARBITRATORS TO        IMPOSE SANCTIONS IN THE FORM OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND        COSTS AS A PUNITIVE MEASURE ARISING FROM AN ABSENCE OF        GOOD FAITH        A. Jurisprudence From the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits cited by           the Second Circuit in ReliaStar Does Not Support the           Court's Novel Holding        B. In Reliastar, the Court Erroneously Conceptualizes the           Terms "Remedies" and "Punitive Sanctions" as well as           "Arbitrator" and "Judge"  V.     TRANSPARENCY AS A STEP TOWARDS DEFINING GOOD FAITH IN        THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION        A. Non-Disclosure of Requested Documents        B. Use and Access of Original Documents        C. Expert Witnesses        D. Understanding Transparency and its Application in           Different Contexts  VI. CONCLUSION 

"Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagee" (1)

Rene Descartes

Discours de La Methode

I. INTRODUCTION

Despite considerable developments in the field of international economic law, (2) economic globalization is yet to witness the creation of its legal counterpart: juridical globalization. Particularly in the field of transnational contentions, the taking of evidence remains one of the most salient challenges in the formation and transformation of an international dispute resolution rubric. Although the chasm separating common and civil law judicial cultures, legacies, and traditions on this issue might appear unbridgeable at first, the imperative to harmonize disparate precepts and policies concerning the taking of evidence between these starkly different legal systems is underscored by economic globalization.

International arbitration, both commercial and treaty-based, has served as a temporal bridge until transnational tribunals of civil procedure have become capable of exercising jurisdiction for purposes of adjudicating commercial disputes in private and public international law. (3) This centrality underscores the need to harmonize conflicting and often inimical procedural tenets concerning common and civil law jurisdictions. Common law practitioners in the United States in particular seem critical of a civil law "taking of evidence" tradition that, viewed through the prism of American "discovery" procedural precepts, wrests all party-autonomy from the litigants and vests primary responsibility with the tribunal. (4) In contrast, civil law academics, jurists, and lawyers cannot fathom normative strictures that impel the production of documents and the disclosure of information that is relevant "to the subject matter involved in the action," where "relevance" is defined as "information [that] need not be admissible at the trial [or final hearing] if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." (5) The gradual resolution of these stark differences, a daunting task, has begun through the evolution of international arbitration.

On May 29, 2010, the International Bar Association (IBA) published a new edition of its rules that aspires "to provide an efficient, economical and fair process for the taking of evidence in international arbitrations, particularly those between Parties from different legal traditions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Good Faith, Bad Faith, but Not Losing Faith: A Commentary on the 2010 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.