A Rubric for Campus Heritage Planning: The Idea Is to Make Architectural Preservation a Part of the Living Progress of the Institution

By Craig, Charles A.; Fixler, David N. et al. | Planning for Higher Education, April-June 2011 | Go to article overview

A Rubric for Campus Heritage Planning: The Idea Is to Make Architectural Preservation a Part of the Living Progress of the Institution


Craig, Charles A., Fixler, David N., Kelly, Sarah D., Planning for Higher Education


rubric: ('ru-brik) 5. an established custom or rule of procedure

Context

This article is inspired by recent observations, events, and publications, as well as by a general and rising concern for and appreciation of the culture of American historical heritage as manifested on college and university campuses.

Interest in this topic stems from the October 2007 symposium "Campus Heritage Planning: The Urban Challenge" convened in Boston by the Boston Preservation Alliance with the sponsorship of the office of the mayor, Thomas M. Menino, the Boston Redevelopment Authority, and the Boston Society of Architects and with the participation of the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP). Approximately 175 institutional representatives, city planners, and planning and design professionals gathered for presentations and discussions on the current status and challenges of historic preservation, practicable renewal, and reinvigoration of urban campuses.

Among the influences and inspirations for this article are Richard P. Dober's (2005) Campus Heritage and the Ford Foundation-sponsored monographs on the topic he prepared early in his career. Dober's work has long advanced campus heritage as a topic of study. Campus Heritage catalogs numerous American examples of historic distinction, buildings and campuses that have shaped our collective imagery and consciousness of higher education.

This article proposes to extend Dober's scholarly rigor beyond identification and citation toward a study methodology useful to campus planners and institutional stewards.

Rising societal trends and topics of professional interest have bearing on current considerations for historic preservation and planning. The Green movement and sustainable design principles suggest to owners and practitioners that the most ecologically responsible building solution is often to retain what is already constructed. The recycling of buildings and building materials restrains one's carbon footprint. Green thinking recognizes that typically less energy is required for the conversion of historic structures, in addition to the value of the carbon embedded within them being conserved.

The campus heritage studies funded by the Getty Foundation (2003-2007) collectively represent another groundbreaking venture into campus heritage planning that has advanced the discourse. The Getty Foundation grants have resulted in an array of thoughtful studies that record a sampling of historic campuses in the United States. A review of these documents, recently collected and digitized for access by scholars and practitioners by SCUP, shows a broad range of approaches to addressing campus heritage. Some campus studies are rigorously historical chronologies of campus development. Others are focused on architecture and landscape development, eliding examination of sociological contexts or mention of the critical influences of leaders, donors, theorists, or influential practitioners in other professional disciplines, notably engineers and planners. Yet other studies can be characterized as reasoned and thorough campus plans, with a modicum of historic reference and research. While the nuances of unique sites and histories will and should always influence campus heritage planning, this article proposes an initial definition of a comprehensive campus heritage planning procedure in an effort to promote a common understanding of the discipline. It defines the constituent elements of a plan, the critical areas of study, and the necessary components for documenting heritage as manifested in college and university environments.

Fundamental Propositions

American college campuses and the buildings on them are reminders of youth and the challenge of learning. They are repositories of local, regional, and national memory. More than any other examples found in the built environment, they exhibit the full panoply of American architecture, from 18th-century Georgian to High Victorian to Collegiate Neo-Gothic to minimalist Modern. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Rubric for Campus Heritage Planning: The Idea Is to Make Architectural Preservation a Part of the Living Progress of the Institution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.