Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Spreading the Word: The Prevention of Emerging Pandemics

By Chang, Benson | Harvard International Review, Spring 1996 | Go to article overview

Spreading the Word: The Prevention of Emerging Pandemics

Chang, Benson, Harvard International Review

ON DECEMBER 14, 1994, A US GOVernment interagency working group was established under the jurisdiction of the Committee of International Science, Engineering, and Technology Policy (CISET), under the auspices of of President Clinton's National Science and Technology Council. This working group consists of members from 17 different government agencies and departments, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Department of Defense, and the Department of State.

The group was assembled to assess the global threat of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. Included in the group's recent report was a map detailing the current outbreaks of infectious diseases worldwide. Only one continent remains unaffected by outbreaks of deadly infectious diseases, and Antarctica offers precious little refuge for the world's populations against the rising threat of widespread epidemics.

Once again humanity faces diseases so deadly and infectious that entire populations could be decimated. What is especially problematic is the rate at which disease can now spread aided by modern transportation. Certain diseases seem to be leapfrogging continents at an alarming rate, and worst of all, the origin and mode of transmission for diseases is becoming increasingly difficult to determine.

Adding to this already grim situation, public health officials are worried that diseases are growing ever more resistant to the drugs we use to treat them, and that not only will there be a surge in epidemics of current diseases, but also that old strains thought long defeated will reappear. To understand why drug resistant disease strains are becoming so troublesome, though, a basic understanding of antibiotics is required.

The action of antibiotics involves several different aspects. First of all, an antibiotic is a chemical that disrupts the life cycle of an infectious agent. Antibiotics are generally used on bacteria or simple unicellular microscopic organisms, with several different effects. An antibiotic can inhibit the growth of the bacterial cell wall, impede the transfer of nutrients in and out of the bacterial cell, interfere with protein synthesis in a bacterial cell, or even disrupt bacterial gene replication. If an antibiotic kills a microorganism outright, it is called bactericidal; if it merely inhibits their growth, it is termed bacteriostatic. Penicillins are the most notable bactericidal antibiotics, and the tetracyclines are known for their bacteriostatic effect.

The discovery and use of antibiotics has occurred within the last century. In the late 19th century Louis Pasteur and Jules Francois Joubert recognized that anthrax bacteria failed to grow if they were contaminated by airborne bacteria. However, it wasn't until 1928 that the first antibiotic was scientifically identified. Alexander Fleming noticed that the bacteria S. aureus was killed by the bread mold Penicillium notatum, and he named the chemical agent that had done the deed penicillin. However, isolating the active agent proved to be difficult, and penicillin remained scarce until 1957, when it was synthesized in the laboratory. Modern antibiotics are thus mostly semisynthetic, or part culture-grown and part synthesized.

With these potent chemicals at the disposal of modern medicine, it is no wonder that widespread epidemics suddenly seemed to be a thing of the past during the last few decades. Why are epidemics still occurring, then, if the modern medicine has such a sensitive and thorough line of defense? Part of the problem stems from the appearance of bacterial diseases resistant to our modern antibiotics.

Resistance to antibiotics among these new diseases is a product of artificial selection. When antibiotics came into widespread use in the 1950s, bacteria were mostly killed off by the penicillins or tetracyclines with which they came in contact. However, there were always a few survivors, which perhaps had a mutation in their genetic code that gave them resistance to the drug and enabled them to survive.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Spreading the Word: The Prevention of Emerging Pandemics


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.