Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Weapons and Regional Security

By Bajpai, Kanti | Harvard International Review, Summer 1996 | Go to article overview

Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Weapons and Regional Security


Bajpai, Kanti, Harvard International Review


THE DISPUTE BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN appears to have come full circle since the 1950s and 1960s to rest once again on the contested state of Kashmir. But the destructive power possessed by both states has grown enormously since that earlier era, and now includes short-range nuclear weapons and sophisticated conventional arsenals. This growth of military power has meant not just a greater capacity to coerce, deter, and defend, but also a realization that the enormous costs of war will probably outweigh any rational geopolitical gains. With this double-edged nuclear dimension, South Asia stands poised between danger and opportunity.

Although South Asia is not part of the three great formations of North America, Europe, and East Asia that form the core of the international system, the region matters for security, economic, and political reasons. Indian and Pakistani conventional military power have always determined security in and around South Asia, but the current or potential nuclear capabilities of these two nations now affect international security as well. The region also matters because of its economic potential: India and Pakistan have embarked on economic reforms and are growing at rates between four and seven percent per year. With more than a billion people between them, they constitute a market as large as China's. Finally, South Asia merits attention because three nations in the region, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal, have made transitions to democracy since 1988, while two other democracies, India and Sri Lanka, survive in difficult circumstances. The success of South Asia's new and old democracies in the midst of some of the most hostile conditions on earth could greatly strengthen the cause of democracy worldwide.

Disagreement between India and Pakistan comes from several sources, including the insecurity that Pakistan feels as a result of India's larger size and power and the conflicting nation-building philosophies of the two countries. This philosophical disagreement, between Indian secularism and Pakistani religious particularism, has acquired a zero-sum quality, with the success of secularism taken to be the failure of particularism, and vice versa. In addition, migrations, ethnic rebellions, communal violence, disputes over water, economic inequality, narcotics, and the spread of small arms have contributed to regional instability.

But the most pressing issue in South Asian stability since 1989 has been the Indo-Pakistani dispute over Kashmir, which has already caused two wars between India and Pakistan, first in 1948 and again in 1965. In 1989, Kashmir exploded with violence in the Indian-held portion and soon faced a full-scale insurrection. In 1990 tensions between India and Pakistan rose in the wake of Pakistani military exercises and an Indian military build-up in Kashmir, and spiraled into what could have become a nuclear confrontation. Even as the two countries sobered in the wake of the crisis, tensions continued. The destruction of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya by Hindu extremists in December 1992 led to riots all over the Indian subcontinent and the demolition of Hindu temples in Pakistan. When Kashmiris on the Pakistani side of the border attempted to cross into India despite warnings from Indian authorities that they would be repelled by force, Pakistani forces shot and killed a number of demonstrators to prevent a border incident. The most serious incident since then occurred in early 1996, when a rocket attack destroyed a mosque in Pakistani-held Kashmir. Islamabad blamed Indian forces, and the two sides exchanged artillery fire.

Tension between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has caused anxiety outside the region, but seen in light of the regional record these tensions are not as alarming as they may initially appear. The same confluence of factors present in South Asia since 1989--internal troubles in Kashmir, Pakistani aid for the insurgents, and domestic political instability in India--combined to produce war in 1948 and 1965. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Weapons and Regional Security
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.