First California Omits Any Mention of Hostile Bid in M&A Doc

By Monks, Matthew | American Banker, August 24, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

First California Omits Any Mention of Hostile Bid in M&A Doc

Monks, Matthew, American Banker

Byline: Matthew Monks

A hostile bid for First California Financial Group (FCAL) in May stunned the bank M&A world and nearly derailed a deal the Westlake, Calif., company had in the works.

But you would not know it from scanning the proxy statement that First California filed last week in connection with its February agreement to buy Premier Service Bank in Riverside for $2 million in stock.

The parties filed a joint S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday that shares highly selective details about First California's situation as it tries to complete the Premier deal.

Investors and analysts who read the document for tidbits about where First California might stand in its own "strategic review" announced on Aug. 1 were disappointed. The filing does not mention First California's decision to hire Keefe, Bruyette & Woods (KBW) to consider its options. Nor does it directly address the unsolicited $212 million offer from PacWest Bancorp (PACW) that First California rejected in May. PacWest's name does not appear in the document, though there is a reference to "recent events involving unsolicited offers" that are not explained.

First California is staying as mum as possible on those matters for several reasons, experts say. It legally can, they say, as the filing is on behalf of holders of 1.3 million shares of Premier who will vote to approve or reject the transaction at an upcoming special meeting.

The filing's purpose is to explain to Premier shareholders why it is being sold and what they are to receive for their interest in the $137 million-asset bank, experts say.

First California shareholders are not voting on the deal. That fact gives First California broad leeway to determine what is and is not material in discussing its own operations. Were First California shareholders getting a say in this deal, experts say, First California probably would have to be more up-front about its strategic circumstances.

"They don't have to discuss everything about the proxy contest," says Kip Weissman, a partner with law firm Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick in Washington who specializes in bank mergers but is not involved with First California.

It is also in First California's interest to keep in the dark any banks that might try to outbid PacWest, says Joe Gladue, an analyst with B. Riley who covers First California and other California banks. It does not want the market to know whether other suitors, or which ones, are in the mix, he says.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

First California Omits Any Mention of Hostile Bid in M&A Doc


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?