Amicus Tells (Supreme) Court: Butt out, It's Up to Quebecers to Decide

By Joli-Coeur, Andre | Canadian Speeches, March 1998 | Go to article overview

Amicus Tells (Supreme) Court: Butt out, It's Up to Quebecers to Decide


Joli-Coeur, Andre, Canadian Speeches


ANDRE JOLI-COEUR

Amicus Curiae at the Supreme Court hearing

The message of the amicus curiae to the Supreme Court of Canada on the Quebec secession issue is, in effect, butt out. Appointed to represent a different point of view, the friend of the court advised the court not to answer the three questions posed by the federal government for a number of claimed reasons. The court doesn't have the constitutional authority to consider this type of reference. The questions are hypothetical. Secession is subject to international law, not Canadian law. The questions are an attack on the rights and privileges of the Quebec National Assembly and democratic prinples. Secession is a matter to be determined by the people of Quebec, who have a right to secede unilaterally. Effective control of its territory would make a sovereign Quebec a political reality to which Canada would have to adapt. Excerpts from argument presented to the Supreme Court of Canada February 18, 199. Translated from French and edited for publication.

On July 11, 1997, your court conferred a mandate upon me to submit argument defending positions different from those advanced by the other parties in response to the questions contained in the executive order of the federal government, going back to September 30, 1996, and to bring to the attention of the court any other relevant items.

I would like to underscore a few important elements that are involved in this whole reference question.

First of all, the vast majority of the people of Quebec, whether they feel some attachment for Canada or not, believe that they alone have the right to collectively and democratically choose their future. This right is, according to them, inalienable.

And secondly, the people of Quebec and its institutions have always made known their concerns for the legitimate rights of the native people and the other minorities. This concern found materiality in the adoption of a charter of rights well before 1982, a charter that consecrates the fundamental values that concern a number of intervenors.

I would remind us all that on June 22, 1990, following the failure of the Meech Lake accord when certain provincial legislative assemblies, other than that of Quebec, had not recognized that the people of Quebec formed a distinct society, the very federalist premier of the time, Mr. Bourasa, rose in the National Assembly to proclaim very clearly what follows:

"English Canada must understand in a very clear manner that whatever is said or done, Quebec is today and for all times a distinct society, free, capable of assuming its destiny and its development."

And even before, in 1965, another of our premiers, Daniel Johnson, father of a sovereignist premier and father also of a federalist premier, underscored this same reality in different words.

"With time," he said, "the world has changed. What used to be the fight for survival has become the fight for self-determination. But the reality remains the same. Today, as in 1763, we set aside the possibility of assimilation and affirm our right to remain ourselves and to develop freely on this North American continent where history and destiny have placed us."

Last Thursday, February 12, our premier reminded us that "a democracy is the basis of the choice to be taken in Quebec. According to all Quebec democrats and a growing number of Canadian democrats, the final word does not belong to one man, to one government, not to a legal text, but according to us, the final word belongs to the Quebec democracy, to the people of Quebec."

Finally, quite outside considerations of democratic principles, this reference brings about a number of concerns as to its very usefulness. In this regard, while reaffirming the weight of democracy, our cardinal, the archbishop of Montreal, Jean-Claude Turcotte, expressed his concern with respect to this reference. He said:

"The fear that I share with others remains simply that the recourse to this means, and I recognize that it is at once legitimate and respectable, I fear that this will only serve to harden positions that are already exacerbated.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Amicus Tells (Supreme) Court: Butt out, It's Up to Quebecers to Decide
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.