Arab-Israeli Conflict: Is It History?

By Delvoie, Louis A. | Behind the Headlines, Autumn 1997 | Go to article overview

Arab-Israeli Conflict: Is It History?


Delvoie, Louis A., Behind the Headlines


For two generations of Western politicians, diplomats, and scholars, the most serious regional conflict in the world was the Arab-Israeli dispute. For many, it still is. But does it rate this degree of concern and attention today on the part of the West?

The traditional Western interest in the dispute was firmly rooted in certain features of the region in which it was to unfold. Beyond the literary and scholarly horizons opened up by the now much criticized school of `Orientalists' and the popular appetite for the tales of exploration and adventure of the likes of Richard Burton, T.E. Lawrence, and Wilfred Thesiger, the Western world's primary interest in the Middle East was as a transit route linking Britain, France, Portugal, and Holland with their empires in Asia. First the overland route and then the Suez Canal were seen as vital assets in political, economic, and military terms.

The strategic importance of the Middle East region for the West increased dramatically with the discovery of oil in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian peninsula in the 1920s and 1930s. Not only the oil producing countries but also the Suez Canal as the route for the westward movement of oil took on an importance they had never before enjoyed in Western eyes. Indeed the region became one of the key prizes fought over during the Second World War.

The end of that war gave rise to a new dimension of Western involvement in the Middle East. When the full extent and horror of the crimes perpetrated against the Jews of Europe by Germany's Third Reich slowly sank into their consciousness, the peoples of Western Europe and North America were overcome by sympathy or a sense or guilt, or both. One Western nation after another rallied to the Zionist call for the creation of a Jewish state in the Middle East and gave support to the United Nations plan to partition Palestine. This humanitarian impulse remained dominant as the fledgling state of Israel fought off a concerted attack by its Arab neighbours and in turn provoked the mass exodus of Palestinians, who were to become homeless refugees throughout the region.

The creation of the state of Israel and its first war with its neighbours transformed what had been a localized struggle into a major regional conflict. The traditional `Palestine question' had been confined within a reasonably finite territory in which Palestinian Arabs and Jews vied for control. What became the `Arab-Israeli conflict' was to pit the Jewish state against an ever increasing number of Arab countries from the Atlantic to the Persian Gulf and was to become a major source of political and military instability.

The onset of the cold war and its spread beyond its initial European and East-West axes gave yet another dimension to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Progressively the United States and the Soviet Union became more heavily engaged in the Middle East and on opposite sides of various fences. The United States and its Western allies tended to support Israel and the conservative Arab regimes. The Soviet Union and its East European allies supported the revolutionary Arab regimes, most notably Egypt and Syria, which were Israel's strongest and most committed adversaries.

Thus what came to distinguish the Arab-Israeli dispute from so many other regional conflicts was that it seemed to represent the greatest threat to international peace and security and thus to the welfare of people around the world. There was general recognition that wars between Israel and its Arab neighbours posed a real risk of escalation and global conflagration because of the very direct and adversarial political and military engagement of the two superpowers in the region. Indeed, those fears proved well justified and were, if anything, intensified by events surrounding the 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars.

But if there was a steady and understandable increase in Western interest and involvement in Arab-Israeli affairs between the 1940s and the 1970s, in the intervening years many developments argue that this trend has more than run its course.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Arab-Israeli Conflict: Is It History?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.