Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

"The Sea Is History": Opium, Colonialism, and Migration in Amitav Ghosh's Sea of Poppies

By: Arora, Anupama | ARIEL, July-October 2011 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

"The Sea Is History": Opium, Colonialism, and Migration in Amitav Ghosh's Sea of Poppies


Arora, Anupama, ARIEL


A light-skinned African American freedman passing for white, an Indian female farmer who has been rescued from sati (widow immolation), a French woman disguised as an Indian labourer, a British opium merchant, a half-Parsi and half-Chinese convict--these are some of the "mongrel" characters with complex histories that populate Amitav Ghosh's most recent novel, Sea of Poppies. Published in 2008, this novel is the first installment in a trilogy, which takes on the task of imagining the ways in which the histories of slavery, Opium trade, British Empire, and migration are interwoven. The story is set in 1838 against the backdrop of the opium trade and the beginnings of migration of indentured Indian labour to the Caribbean. The range of characters on the ship Ibis, an American ex-slaver now transporting Indian labourers to Mauritius, offers a broad canvas for Ghosh's historical novel of transnational connectivity. Through the interweaving of the characters' stories and through deploying elements from a variety of genres (historical novel, nautical novel, travel and adventure fiction), the novel offers a narrative of and about movement, border-crossings, and heterogeneous encounters.

While Ghosh alludes to the link between land and sea through the title and the tripartite structure (land, river, sea) of the novel, most of the novel takes place on the Ibis, and even Part One of the novel (which is titled "land") is full of references to sailors, bodies of water, boats and ships. (2) Almost all the characters feel the effects of the ocean on their lives in one way or another. Thus, one can read Sea of Poppies as a narrative of place where the ocean is central but where the dynamics on land intimately create and affect the world of the ocean. The novel illustrates the intimate relation between "history, politics, and bodies of water" (Verges 247) through its attention to the Indian Ocean. (3) This focus emphasizes how the British Empire was situated within global networks and highlights the textured realities of Empire--"a complex web consisting of horizontal filaments that run among various colonies" rather than a strictly vertical relationship between the center and individual colonies (qtd. in Metcalf 7). Through oceanic networks, ideas, commodities, and people flow from India to a variety of spaces--China, Mauritius, England, the United States. Thus, the Indian Ocean is a palimpsest for Ghosh, and in his evocative mapping of this place and time, it becomes a rich archive where he reads layers upon layers of stories of power and violence, exchange, resistance, and survival. The body of the ship itself--deck, timbers, and hold--carries inscriptions of different histories (of non-Western sailors, the slave trade, indentured labour). Cross-cultural, caste, class, gender, and national collaborations blur all sorts of boundaries and enable the formation of new alliances (both oppressive and liberating) and emergence of reconstituted families within contexts of domination and resistance. The crisscrossing oceanic trading routes offer up an affective map of the world of unlikely kinships and intimacies formed on the fluid world of the ocean as a consequence of the machinations and practices of Empire.

Its broad canvas with intersecting plot-lines situates Sea of Poppies within the context of recent interest in studies of the Indian Ocean, transatlanticism, opium and Empire, and of older well-known studies of the Atlantic Ocean. The work of historians such as Clare Anderson (Convicts in the Indian Ocean), Sugata Bose, and Thomas R. Metcalf in the last decade has demanded a critical reflection on the Indian Ocean and the histories found there as a significant site for studying global relationships. Through studying the movement of peoples, practices, ideas, and goods in this place, these scholars shed light on the palimpsestic nature of the Indian Ocean world where multiple histories exist. Recent studies on the significance of opium trade to the global imperial economy have also contributed to the interest in the Indian Ocean, since it functioned as the arena for the multifarious encounters. Carl A. Trocki, David Anthony Bello, and Curtis Marez (Drug Wars) have all offered studies on the British Empire in Asia, focusing on the circulating commodity of opium and its significance for European expansion and empire-building. If Ghosh builds on the recent work of these historians of the Indian Ocean and opium, it is also impossible to think through the novel's treatment of the circuits of global migration and the counter-culture of modernity without the earlier work of Paul Gilroy, Peter Linebaugh, and Marcus Rediker on the Atlantic Ocean. Sea of Poppies follows in the wake of this scholarship, and this work infuses and inspires Ghosh's fictional world. This novel also pushes ahead Ghosh's project of investigating the multi-dimensionality of postcolonial history and experience. Anshuman A. Mondal lists a set of "core issues" that Ghosh meditates upon in all his works. (4) For instance, Ghosh's novels often imagine the world from the perspective of displaced peoples and focus on peoples' histories often relegated to the margins of Eurocentric narratives of history. In The Glass Palace (2000), Ghosh focuses on the "forgotten" histories of WWII such as the "Forgotten Long March," the harrowing march of Indian settlers from Burma to India in the wake of a Japanese advance. In An Antique Land (1992) explores African-Asian connections preceding British colonialism and "other" non-European worlds and connections. The Shadow Lines (1988) interrogates both the legacies of Partition in the subcontinent as well as the silence surrounding riots in nationalist histories since riots call attention to the failures of the postcolonial nation-state. The massacre at Morichjhapi of Bangladeshi refugees by the Indian state in 1979 finds voice in The Hungry Tide (2004), where Ghosh focuses on the islands of the Sunderbans to unsettle the notion of progress by showing the costs of developmentalism through the predicament of refugees and indigenous peoples. And, in The Calcutta Chromosome (1995), Ghosh questions the colonial narrative of discovery and progress by disputing the colonial "truth" of Ronald Ross' discovery of the cure for malaria. Thus, Ghosh has variously exposed the limits of (imperial) archives and questioned the myth of progress in his corpus. In Sea of Poppies, Ghosh revisits themes and preoccupations of his earlier work and presents a historical novel of panoramic scope and great depth, populated with characters from different continents with complex histories and conflicting interests.

I. Archiving the Ocean: A Tale of Opium and Sailors

Ghosh emphasizes the linked histories of the travel of opium, lascars, and migrant labour and contests their marginal place in the colonial archives. Scholars such as Antoinette Burton, Laura Ann Stoler, and Durba Ghosh have theorized that colonial archives "served as technologies of imperial power, conquest, and hegemony" (Burton 7). Scholars contend that archives are not simple or simply repositories of "fact" and "truth" but are imbricated within power, involving processes of construction, selection, and interpretation. Thus, archives silence as much as reveal the past, privileging some narratives over others. In his book, Imperial Connections, Metcalf writes of how the Indian Ocean came to be neglected in the, colonial archives in the nineteenth century because it came to seen as "empty" of history in contrast to the drama of the trading voyages and European rivalries of the previous centuries: "It is as if a bustling sea full of vessels and people had suddenly been emptied,

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?