Cognitive Mapping, Then and Now: Postmodernism, Indecision, and American Literary Globalism

By Sauri, Emilio | Twentieth Century Literature, Fall-Winter 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Cognitive Mapping, Then and Now: Postmodernism, Indecision, and American Literary Globalism


Sauri, Emilio, Twentieth Century Literature


  Mere belief is hostile to the whole idea of thinking.   To wear credulity as one's badge of intellect is not   to be a thinker as such    --n+1, "A Regressive Avant-Garde" (2004)    And yet, the best of Jameson's work has felt mind-blowing   in the way of LSD or mushrooms: here before you is the world   you'd always known you were living in, but apprehended as if   for the first time in the freshness of its beauty and horror.    --Benjamin Kunkel, "Into the Tent" (2009) 

Toward the middle of Benjamin Kunkel's Indecision (2005), Dwight B. Wilmerding tells his sister Alice, "I feel like I'm evens proof: That's one idea for a major problem I must have" (141) Reflecting on the end of the Cold War, Dwight explains that, "The Wall came down, whole world changed, now we're not going to die in a nuclear holocaust anymore. But it really didn't feel like anything was happening--not to me. I feel like I have a certain resistance to events. (140). What Kunkel's narrator means when he describes himself as "event proof" would seem to be an inability to "feel" history, and this is confirmed later, when, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, he recalls being "amazed ... that I continued living my life, doing everything I did, despite the confusion involved, like it was somehow regular and automatic" (183). Thus, if Dwight feels as if "events don't always seem to happen, even when they do" (149), then his "major problem" is that this "resistance to events" prevents him not from knowing history but from experiencing it. In indecision, then, the fact that Dwight cannot experience history is also conceived as the source of his abulia, a condition that not only leaves him with a chronic inability to make any decision, no matter how trivial, but also incapable of conceptualizing historical change: "I couldn't think of the future," Dwight says, "until I arrived there" (3). But while this unique condition animates an almost exaggerated form of self-consciousness that contributes to what a number of critics have described as the novel's equally unique narrative voice, it is this same "resistance to events" that will lead his Argentine-Belgian love interest, Brigid, to complain, "Nothing can happen to you. You are that type" (175). (1) indecision nonetheless is, as Dwight affirms in its opening pages, a "narrative of life-changing events" (3), in which a fruit conjured up in the jungles of Ecuador comes to embody the solution to his "major problem": "When you eat from this fruit," Brigid tells Dwight, "then whenever you put your hand on a product, a commodity, an article, then, at the moment of your touch, how this commodity came into your hands becomes plainly evident to you" (216). This solution, then, will not only allow Dwight to "feel" history in a strangely literal sense, but also alerts ' us to the novels marked interest in a distinctly postmodern predicament.

For what Indecision evokes here is nothing other than the possibility of overcoming what Fredric Jameson first described in 1984 as the "waning of our historicity, of our lived possibility of experiencing history in some active way" ("Postmodernism" 68). Indeed, one cannot help but think of the subject Jameson identifies as having "lost its capacity to organize its past and future into coherent experience" (71), when, for example, Dwight recounts living "from day to day as if ... on a bridge saying in the wind while both sides of the canyon ... past and future ... disappeared in foggy weather" (19). Which is to say that if Dwight is, in Brigid's words, a "type," he is one that will recall Jameson's subject of postmodernism in rather explicit ways. And if Kunkel's novel can be best understood as an attempt to dramatize what Jameson calls a "weakening of historicity" ("Postmodernism" 58), it is perhaps not surprising that the possibility of overcoming what Dwight recognizes as an inability to experience history is also imagined in the novel as having decisively political consequences; consequences which, in taking the form of a political awakening, will speak directly to both our understanding of postmodernism then, and the possibility of imagining something like an after-postmodernism now.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Cognitive Mapping, Then and Now: Postmodernism, Indecision, and American Literary Globalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?