Sovereign Quebec and U.S. National Interests

By Morici, Peter | American Review of Canadian Studies, Spring 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Sovereign Quebec and U.S. National Interests


Morici, Peter, American Review of Canadian Studies


Introduction

The United States and Canada have one of the most intense political and economic relationships of any two nations in the world, and Americans have benefited greatly from it. A sovereign Quebec has the potential to radically disrupt this order; however, whether Quebec sovereignty would fundamentally damage it would depend in part on U.S. actions prior to a sovereignty referendum and during the negotiations between Ottawa and Quebec to establish a new constitutional arrangement. In this paper, these two periods are referred to as the campaign and the transition.

U.S.-Canada cooperation is built on many economic and security arrangements, such as the 1965 Automotive Agreement, NAFTA, and NORAD, and U.S.-Canada cooperation in multilateral fora such as NATO, the UN, and the World Trade Organization (WTO). The effective assimilation of Quebec into these structures would be critical to maintaining the benefits the United States currently enjoys from its relationship with Canada. Whether Quebec is to assume the status of a sovereign nation is clearly a matter for Canadians to decide--without American interference. However, once a transition began, the United States would have a significant interest in ensuring that a newly independent Quebec would be properly integrated into North American and multilateral structures.

To examine how U.S. policymakers should react to a Yes vote in some future referendum, we must ask what the question would be and what the new constitutional arrangement might look like. Quebec sovereigntists have established the goal of continued sharing of some national responsibilities between Ottawa and Quebec City; however, the ultimate scope of shared responsibilities is difficult to predict. The first part of this paper briefly addresses these questions. The transition would be a highly charged environment, and the interests and actions of principal actors in the Rest of Canada (ROC), Quebec, and the United States would be affected both by forces specific to the campaign experience and by circumstances external to North America. The second part discusses the salient global and regional forces that would affect the actions of North American leaders during the transition, while the third part analyzes what actions the United States should take as a supportive neighbor and to serve its own national interests during the campaign and the transition.

What Are We Talking About?

The editors' charge to the authors here was to analyze the consequences of a sovereign Quebec; therefore, without speculating about probabilities, this paper assumes that a referendum with a question similar to the one posed in 1995 is held and a majority of the residents of Quebec vote Yes. How much of a majority? Enough that Ottawa feels compelled to negotiate a radically altered constitutional arrangement or, if Ottawa balks, then Quebec has enough of a majority to issue a unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) that is seen as legitimate by the international community.

Under these conditions, the two scenarios suggested by Remi Hyppia offer a good framework for analysis. They might be best viewed as end-points on a continuum. Under the soft sovereignty scenario, ROC and Quebec would agree to partnership in foreign and security policy. This could even include well-integrated armed forces and joint participation in security alliances; however, for Quebec to be the master of its economic and cultural future, it could determine that this should not include international economic policy, such as the terms and conditions of its participation in NAFTA and the WTO.

Under the hard sovereignty scenario, Ottawa takes a hard line, negotiations fail, and Quebec issues a UDI. Again, since the purpose of this paper is to analyze the consequences of sovereignty, it is assumed that Quebec succeeds in securing control over its borders and exercises the powers of a sovereign state; however, it is left with the daunting task of establishing all of its international relationships--including its ties with the United States--from scratch and with little support from Canada.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Sovereign Quebec and U.S. National Interests
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?