When CSR Clicks: In a New IABC Research Foundation Study, Stakeholders Rate How Well Companies Communicate Their CSR Activities Online

By Castillo, Silvia McCallister; Illia, Laura et al. | Communication World, September-October 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

When CSR Clicks: In a New IABC Research Foundation Study, Stakeholders Rate How Well Companies Communicate Their CSR Activities Online


Castillo, Silvia McCallister, Illia, Laura, Rodriguez-Canovas, Belen, Communication World


Corporate social responsibility programs need to be well run and strategic in scope in order to have an impact. However, to communicate the range and importance of CSR activities, companies must navigate a complex web of diverse stakeholder groups with different needs and motivations.

An IABC Research Foundation study currently under way aims to identify best practices in CSR communication. The first phase of the project explores how companies communicate CSR programs via corporate CSR websites and other online media, and how they reach out to multiple stakeholders in a way that is simple, credible and interactive. (Additional results will be published in 2013.)

New media, including blogs and social networking sites, are recognized as important channels for stakeholder consultation. However, social media and other online tools have not historically been used for increasing interaction and dialogue about CSR activities, according to "Perceptions of Corporations on Facebook: An Analysis of Facebook Social Norms" by Purdue University Professor Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Ph.D., and similar research. Rather, the blogosphere is more often used as a means to transmit corporate messages and identify the most influential stakeholders in a specific CSR area. Few companies have fully explored the use of social media for stakeholder consultation.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

So we asked: Are there companies that are doing this well? And which companies best communicate online with stakeholders in terms of simplicity, credibility and interactivity?

To find out, we interviewed 37 people from different stakeholder groups with different communication needs in terms of these criteria. These groups included students; investors and analysts; customers and potential customers; professionals and scholars; employees; the media; and potential recipients of CSR efforts, grants or partnerships.

After conducting the interviews and identifying the communication needs of each group, we designed a code sheet to analyze the online communication of top companies. Our content analysis aimed to identify the companies that best communicate about CSR online with each group. We selected 72 companies from 15 countries through non-statistical purposive sampling, on the basis of their ranking on 33 diverse CSR-related indices, including the Lundquist CSR Online Awards, the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, the Social Media Sustainability Index and FTSE4Good, among others. All of the companies were listed as leaders on two separate reports and/or were mentioned by two different interviewees as a leader in CSR and/or CSR communication. We analyzed the CSR websites of each of the selected companies and examined all web pages dealing with CSR, plus any documents uploaded in PDF format. And we looked at any online social media accounts, including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, if available.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Key findings

In general, our analysis reveals that stakeholders do agree on some features for optimal online CSR communication. All stakeholder groups prefer to find CSR information within one click from the company home page; they prefer to consult videos or interactive maps for more in-depth information; and they appreciate concrete facts about the CSR effort's impact, budget and external audit as well as detailed information about activities.

A summary of common stakeholder opinions of what makes a company's CSR communication simple, credible and interactive is provided in Table 1.

However, our analysis also reveals large differences in the interest in and awareness of aspects of CSR among different stakeholder groups--that is, what is most attractive to an analyst will not be as important to a customer or an NGO.

For an analyst, according to one study participant, "the most important information would be the financial numbers in the annual report," whereas a customer prefers to "see details about the results of the projects and budgets [.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

When CSR Clicks: In a New IABC Research Foundation Study, Stakeholders Rate How Well Companies Communicate Their CSR Activities Online
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?