Doctoral Students' Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Mixed Analysis

By Anderson, Monika R.; Ingram, Jacqueline M. et al. | International Journal of Doctoral Studies, Annual 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Doctoral Students' Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Mixed Analysis


Anderson, Monika R., Ingram, Jacqueline M., Buford, Brandie J., Rosli, Roslinda, Bledsoe, Michelle L., Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., International Journal of Doctoral Studies


Introduction

Since the early 1920s, administrators representing virtually all universities and colleges worldwide have been using some form of evaluation instrument to measure teacher effectiveness (Guthrie, 1954; Kulik, 2001; Seldin, 1993). These teacher evaluation forms (TEFs) have an impact on decisions regarding teachers' pay, tenure, promotion, and awards (Onwuegbuzie, Witcher, et al., 2007). Indeed, as noted by Washburn and Thornton (1996), TEFs often are used as the sole measure of teacher effectiveness. Additionally, these forms aid students in choosing teachers and courses (Gray & Bergmann, 2003; Marsh & Roche, 1993; Seldin, 1993). Thus, it is vital that data yielded by these TEFS are maximally valid.

Onwuegbuzie, Witcher, et al. (2007) assessed the validity of scores pertaining to a TEF by examining 912 students' perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers. Their study was informative because they were able to develop themes and meta-themes that produced what they termed as the CARE-RESPECTED Model of Teaching Evaluation. This model comprised nine characteristics (i.e., Responsive, Enthusiast, Student-Centered, Professional, Expert, Connector, Transmitter, Ethical, and Director) that factored into four meta-themes (Communicator, Advocate, Responsible, Empowering) that students considered to reflect effective college teaching. These nine themes and four meta-themes are described in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

Through their model, Onwuegbuzie, Witcher, et al. (2007) hoped to develop an instrument that would provide formative and summative information about the efficacy of instruction. Interestingly, their model has been so popular that from 2007 until 2012, Onwuegbuzie, Witcher, et al.'s (2007) article was the most downloaded article among all articles ever published in the American Educational Research Journal. Since this article was published, educational researchers have increased their interest in TEFs. Indeed, prior to Onwuegbuzie, Witcher, et al.'s (2007) study, there were only six notably published studies in this area. These studies are presented in Table 3. The authors of these works identified several characteristics of effective teaching. Table 4 presents articles in the area of TEFs that were identified through the EBSCOHOST from 2007 to 2011. To locate these articles, two key phrases were used. The first search involved use of the search phrase "student perceptions of effective teachers," which yielded 153 articles, of which six articles were applicable to the current study, and the second search involved use of the search phrase "evaluation of college teachers," which yielded 116 articles, of which four articles were applicable to the current study. These articles informed the sections that follow.

Historical Reflection of TEFs

Calkins and Micari (2010) revealed that the first formal student rating systems occurred in the mid 1920s at Purdue University. These rating systems assessed the following effective teaching traits: (a) fairness in grading, (b) stimulating intellectual curiosity, and (c) personal peculiarities. During this time, university faculty members, who were held in high scholarly regard, had complete autonomy of their classrooms and could disregard student ratings at their discretion. By the 1950s, however, scholarly regard was beginning to be replaced with skepticism during the Postwar era (Calkins & Micari, 2010). The McCarthy proceedings, which aroused suspicion of Communist education occurring at the university level, influenced government officials to use student ratings to control lectures and to target and to release faculty members who were suspected of Communist instruction. Although students believed that they were gaining power and a voice on their campuses, student rating systems became the leading leverage that government officials would use to monitor curriculum and to hold professors accountable for student success (Calkings & Micari, 2010).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Doctoral Students' Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Mixed Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?