Reclaiming a Contextualized Approach to the Right to State-Funded Counsel in Child Protection Cases

By Kehoe, Kate; Wiseman, David | University of New Brunswick Law Journal, January 2012 | Go to article overview

Reclaiming a Contextualized Approach to the Right to State-Funded Counsel in Child Protection Cases


Kehoe, Kate, Wiseman, David, University of New Brunswick Law Journal


Introduction

I.  State-funded Counsel in Child Protection Cases
            A. Origins: G.(J.)
            B. Subsequent Claims and Concerns
            C. The T.L. Approach

II. In Defence of a Contextual Approach
            A. Against Assimilation to the Restrictive Criminal Context
               Test
                i. State-funded Counsel in Criminal Cases: Competing
                      Strains
               ii. The Legal Context of Child Protection Proceedings
            B. Legal Aid and State-funded Counsel
            C. Self-representation, Social Context, Fair Hearings and
               Judicial Responsibility

III. A Contextual Approach to State-funded Counsel in Child Protection
        Cases

Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

In Canadian courtrooms where child protection applications are heard, it is still common to find parents trying to respond to those applications without the assistance of legal counsel, which they believe they cannot afford. This despite the fact that a right to state-funded counsel in child protection cases, when necessary to ensure a fair trial, was recognized under the Charter by the Supreme Court in 1999 in the ground-breaking case of New Brunswick v. G. (J.). (1) That decision prompted reviews of legal aid plans across the country, many of which had totally excluded child protection matters, and so produced something of a systemic improvement to the plight of unrepresented parents. However, income-eligibility cut-offs for legal aid in child protection matters have remained relatively low, especially given the constant unmatched increases in cost-of-living. Moreover, in many provinces, there have been significant general cuts to legal aid funding since G.(J). Consequently, there remain parents involved in child protection matters who are not eligible for legal aid counsel but who cannot, at least in their own assessment, afford to pay for counsel themselves. The G.(J.) right to state-funded counsel therefore continues to be relevant and to be claimed. Our review of reported cases reveals that these claims are often unsuccessful and the purpose of this article is to critically analyze the approach of courts to these claims. Ultimately, we identify and defend a contextualized, less restrictive approach to state-funded counsel claims.

The analysis which follows addresses a variety of issues that need further attention in developing a contextualized approach. Our analysis focuses on the most significant element of the test for obtaining state-funded counsel, namely, establishing indigence or, in other words, an inability to afford to pay for counsel. One of the most significant issues relating to indigency is the potential assimilation of the test for eligibility for state-funded counsel in child protection cases to the test used for state-funded counsel claims in criminal cases. When establishing the right to state-funded counsel in child protection cases in G.(J.), the Supreme Court of Canada trod a path parallel to the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Rowbotham, (2) which had earlier established a right to state-funded counsel in a criminal context. In subsequent decisions in both contexts, judges have struggled with how 'strict' to be in assessing eligibility, especially in relation to assessing 'indigency'. Until recently, the approach taken in child protection cases has been restrictive both in terms of the definition of indigency and in terms of procedural strictness. This approach echoes and in some cases even adopts the restrictive approach taken in a number of criminal cases. In 2009, the restrictive approach was questioned and resisted at the trial level of a child protection matter, British Columbia (Director of Child, Family and Community Service) v. T.L., (3) and the approach taken was upheld on appeal. Moreover, last year, the Ontario Court of Appeal itself questioned the strictness that had come to characterize many applications of the Rowbotham test.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reclaiming a Contextualized Approach to the Right to State-Funded Counsel in Child Protection Cases
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.