Legal Professionalism in the Twenty-First Century: Government Lawyers as Accidental Innovators

Murphy, Ronalda, Wilson, Malliha, Wong, Taia, University of New Brunswick Law Journal

INTRODUCTION

The legal profession is at a crossroads. Globalization, economic pressures and the relentless pace of technological change are altering the way in which legal services are delivered. Simultaneously, the crisis over access to justice for the average litigant--neither rich nor poor--imperils the rule of law project more generally. Traditional concepts of legal practice and the legal professional must adapt or risk irrelevance. For many lawyers--professionals for whom work constitutes their personal identity--the prospect of fundamental change is understandably daunting. In our view, however, it need not be disturbing. We do not need to start from scratch; innovative solutions are perhaps closer than we think. This paper discusses how the delivery of legal services is evolving as a result of globalization and technological developments. We then explore the impact of these changes on the professional status of lawyers, and how the legal community articulates its concerns about the impact of such changes on what it means to be a lawyer. We argue that, surprisingly, it is government lawyers who may represent the vanguard on this issue and offer reassurance to the legal profession more generally. This reassurance, if it can be provided, is of course accidental; no one thinks of civil practice with the government as a radical choice or futuristic by nature. And it isn't. But government civil lawyers have to develop a unique skill-set, and internalize a conception of their client that may provide a model for practice and civility in the radically changing legal profession as a whole. If that is indeed the case, then responding and adapting to today's transformative pressures may in fact be easier done, than said. But first, the problem defined.

The Traditional Professionalism Paradigm

Legal professionalism entails duties and service toward others and is comprised of a number of collective ethical aspirations, including collegiality, service to the public good and integrity. It is a manifestation of the belief that the legal profession exists to further the cause of justice and promote the rule of law. (l) Historically, the word "profession" was associated with occupations that "combined public avowals of high purpose with dedication to service and selflessness." (2) Professionals were people whose livelihoods were dedicated to serving people and communities. (3) These occupations were more than a means of subsistence; they embodied a calling to a greater satisfaction than the pursuit of profit.

The paradigm of legal professionalism determines whether lawyer conduct is legitimate, and gives lawyers the exclusive privilege of providing legal services and autonomy in regulating their profession. (4) The notion of legal professionalism arose in the late nineteenth century in response to growing concerns that the more "entrepreneurial" aspects of law were eroding the profession's reputation. (5) Professionalism is based on an understanding between the profession and society, in which the profession agrees to act for the good of clients and society in exchange for autonomy and self-regulatory powers. (6) Informational asymmetry, altruism and autonomy--each of which distinguished a profession from a business--made this bargain both necessary and possible. (7)

Paradigms live and die (8) and various factors are changing the way legal services are delivered. Legal services are expensive and unattainable for many; technology is ubiquitous and accessible--anyone can Google how to draft a will, the expected award of child support, or participate in debates about sentencing law. Clients are tending toward in-house counsel whose expenditures they control, as opposed to deferring to bills presented by external legal fees. Clients are also seeking to secure more legal service at less cost and are increasingly scouring their legal work for tasks that can be unbundled and outsourced to low-cost providers. (9) The Honourable Justice Cromwell raised such concerns in his recent Viscount Bennett lecture:

   Is there a problem with access to civil and family justice? My
   answer, and the answer of every commentator that I know of, is
   "yes." Is the problem serious? Again, I believe the answer is
   "yes." By nearly any standard, our current situation falls far
   short of providing access to the knowledge, resources and services
   that allow people to deal effectively with civil and family legal
   matters. There is a mountain of evidence to support this view. (10)

The legal community is worried about external pressures, and in this article we join those commentators who are asking: what impact will changes wrought by globalization, technological developments and economic pressures have on the traditional concept of legal professionalism?

The evolution of legal services into the 21st century

Lawyers have produced legal information primarily in one way: by advising clients in one-to-one relationships. In his book, The End of Lawyers?, Richard Susskind argues that the delivery of legal services is evolving from 'bespoke' legal services, that is "traditional, hand-crafted, one-to-one consultative professional service, highly tailored for the specific needs of particular clients", along a spectrum that includes standardized, systematized and packaged legal services, toward the commoditization of legal services. (11) The move from customized or bespoke advice toward the sale of legal commodities (12) is largely being enabled by existing and emerging information technologies, as companies figure out how to unbundle and systemize legal advice and services. (13)

(A) The onward match of technology

Relentless technological change is transforming the nature of the legal profession in several ways. The rapid adoption of new technology is changing the delivery of legal services by routinizing and commodifying certain legal transactions. Advances in technology could also potentially lead to the democratization of legal practice by reducing informational asymmetry between lawyers and clients--a key condition to lawyers' status as professionals. The legal profession's exclusive claim to the mastery of esoteric knowledge is arguably being diminished by, for example, the standardization of legal documents and the process of hiring legal counsel. (14)

Susskind identifies several 'disruptive' legal technologies--"technologies ... that do not simply support or sustain the way a business or sector operates; but instead fundamentally challenge or overhaul such a business or sector" that are transforming the delivery of legal services. (15) These disruptive legal technologies include: automated document assembly, relentless …

Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Legal Professionalism in the Twenty-First Century: Government Lawyers as Accidental Innovators. Contributors: Murphy, Ronalda - Author, Wilson, Malliha - Author, Wong, Taia - Author. Journal title: University of New Brunswick Law Journal. Volume: 63. Publication date: January 2012. Page number: 420+. © 2008 University of New Brunswick Law Journal. COPYRIGHT 2012 Gale Group.

This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.