The Middle Palaeolithic in China: A Review of Current Interpretations

By Kei, Yee Mei | Antiquity, September 2012 | Go to article overview

The Middle Palaeolithic in China: A Review of Current Interpretations


Kei, Yee Mei, Antiquity


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Introduction

It has long been the tradition in European archaeological research to divide the Palaeolithic period into three periods: Early, Middle and Upper. Since the study of Chinese Palaeolithic archaeology was largely a creation of visiting European prehistorians (such as Teilhard de Chardin, E. Licent and H. Breuil), this model was imported into China when they began work in the 1920s. In addition, the renowned Professor Pei Wenzhong, who was amongst the first generation of Chinese archaeologists, received his professional training in France. This meant that these western archaeological concepts formed part of his work, and he was the first to use the term 'Middle Palaeolithic' in China (Zhang 1985).

In recent decades, however, the use of the term 'Middle Palaeolithic' in China has been questioned, and some have even suggested that it should be abandoned and replaced by two periods: the Early and Late Palaeolithic (Gao & Norton 2002: 410). China is certainly not the only country where this problem has been raised. The British Middle Palaeolithic was considered by Roe to be "discovered too early for its own good" and that "the scattered, biased and partial record of the early excavations" had caused problems in interpreting the period (White & Pettitt 2011: 88). Clark (2002: 50) thinks that the controversy denotes that archaeologists are not communicating and "there was literally no common basis for discussion". It reflects a common archaeological tendency "to begin defining and naming things rather than beginning with, and naming, defined basic analytic content units" (citing Kleindienst 2006: 13).

This paper aims to review the interpretations of the Middle Palaeolithic period in China. A particular focus will be placed on evaluating the four criteria used by Gao and Norton in their suggestion of abandoning this period in China. It is hoped that the discussion can help shed light on future definitions and studies of this period.

Background to the argument

In China, all archaeological materials dating between the late Middle and early Upper Pleistocene (c. 140-30 kya) are considered Middle Palaeolithic (Gao & Norton 2002: 401). Researchers generally see the period as a development out of the Early Palaeolithic, but vary in their estimates of the innovation achieved. For example, Wang (2005: 146) accepts that when the Upper Pleistocene began, most cultural features were inherited from the Lower and Middle Pleistocene, but certain changes can still be noticed. But it is exactly these changes that laid the foundation for the later development. Hence, the early and middle phases of the Upper Pleistocene can still be seen as an important transition period, irrespective of whether a Middle Palaeolithic culture existed or not. Zhang (1990) also suggests that the lithic industries are inherited from the former period, but there are features showing that they are in a preparatory stage of the next period; progress was definitely made, if little and slow. Du (2006) also suggests that this period shows a certain degree of progress when compared to the Early Palaeolithic, because of the first appearance of new tool types and a 'mind template' resulting from the cultural development and evolution of ancient hominids, while the varieties in lithic assemblage among different sites were due to the difference in raw materials and local geographic conditions.

Qiu (2009) agrees that Chinese Middle Palaeolithic cultures developed directly out of the indigenous Early Palaeolithic, but, rather than being considered as a homogeneous entity, constituted an important link between the relatively uniform Early Palaeolithic cultures and their highly diversified Late Palaeolithic descendants. Meanwhile Wu (1997: 289) suggests that the Late Palaeolithic of China shows clear evidence of continuity with the Middle Palaeolithic without any indications of either accelerated change or disjuncture corresponding to the transition interval. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Middle Palaeolithic in China: A Review of Current Interpretations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.