Why We Must Not Abandon Canada's Activist Foreign Policy
Clark, Joe Louis, Canadian Speeches
Former Prime Minister, and former Minister of Foreign Affairs
Now is not the time to abandon the activist foreign policy that has gained Canada such outstanding leadership in international affairs. Despite the emphasis on trade and economic matters, an activist role in diplomacy and global politics is seen as crucial in a world shrunk by technology and wracked by tension and conflicts. And despite increased difficulties, both domestic and foreign, an activist foreign policy is said to offer Canada greater benefits than ever. Speech to The Institut Quebecois des Hautes Etudes Internationale, Laval University, Quebec City, February 5.
I am honored to be back at Laval today, with the Institut Quebecois des Hautes Etudes Internationale, and want to try to put the issue of trade in some perspective, and emphasize the over-riding importance of broad foreign policy.
Rather often, in Canada, foreign and trade policy have been developed in parallel, rather than in harmony. They sometimes marched to different drummers and, when their rhythms clashed, ministers made choices.
Sometimes those choices placed political goals ahead of trade advantages. For example, despite the clear economic costs, the government in which I was foreign minister chose to impose sanctions on apartheid South Africa, and, again, chose to decline Canadian government participation in research for the strategic defence initiative, or "star wars."
On other occasions, trade purposes could only be accomplished politically. That was clearly the case with the first free trade agreement, between Canada and the United States. A trade issue became a foreign policy priority.
I was often the minister making the political case, the argument that more than money was at stake. That was my job, and my belief, but it also reflected my interpretation of Canada's tradition in international affairs.
Most of our major international decisions as a country were not driven by economic or commercial considerations -- for example, the decision to fight in two world wars and in Korea; the leading role in establishing the United Nations and NATO, and drafting the International Declaration of Human Rights; the opposition to Suez and the virtual invention of peacekeeping; the active role in the Colombo Plan and the establishment of the Canadian International Development Agency; the renewal of the Commonwealth in the fight against apartheid, and the creation of la Francophonie; and the commitment of successive governments to multilateral agencies and international agreements.
To use a ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Why We Must Not Abandon Canada's Activist Foreign Policy.
Contributors: Clark, Joe Louis - Author.
Magazine title: Canadian Speeches.
Volume: 11.
Issue: 5
Publication date: September 1997.
Page number: 12+.
© 1998 Canadian Speeches.
COPYRIGHT 1997 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset