Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Why We Must Not Abandon Canada's Activist Foreign Policy

By: Clark, Joe Louis | Canadian Speeches, September 1997 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Why We Must Not Abandon Canada's Activist Foreign Policy


Clark, Joe Louis, Canadian Speeches


Former Prime Minister, and former Minister of Foreign Affairs

Now is not the time to abandon the activist foreign policy that has gained Canada such outstanding leadership in international affairs. Despite the emphasis on trade and economic matters, an activist role in diplomacy and global politics is seen as crucial in a world shrunk by technology and wracked by tension and conflicts. And despite increased difficulties, both domestic and foreign, an activist foreign policy is said to offer Canada greater benefits than ever. Speech to The Institut Quebecois des Hautes Etudes Internationale, Laval University, Quebec City, February 5.

I am honored to be back at Laval today, with the Institut Quebecois des Hautes Etudes Internationale, and want to try to put the issue of trade in some perspective, and emphasize the over-riding importance of broad foreign policy.

Rather often, in Canada, foreign and trade policy have been developed in parallel, rather than in harmony. They sometimes marched to different drummers and, when their rhythms clashed, ministers made choices.

Sometimes those choices placed political goals ahead of trade advantages. For example, despite the clear economic costs, the government in which I was foreign minister chose to impose sanctions on apartheid South Africa, and, again, chose to decline Canadian government participation in research for the strategic defence initiative, or "star wars."

On other occasions, trade purposes could only be accomplished politically. That was clearly the case with the first free trade agreement, between Canada and the United States. A trade issue became a foreign policy priority.

I was often the minister making the political case, the argument that more than money was at stake. That was my job, and my belief, but it also reflected my interpretation of Canada's tradition in international affairs.

Most of our major international decisions as a country were not driven by economic or commercial considerations -- for example, the decision to fight in two world wars and in Korea; the leading role in establishing the United Nations and NATO, and drafting the International Declaration of Human Rights; the opposition to Suez and the virtual invention of peacekeeping; the active role in the Colombo Plan and the establishment of the Canadian International Development Agency; the renewal of the Commonwealth in the fight against apartheid, and the creation of la Francophonie; and the commitment of successive governments to multilateral agencies and international agreements.

To use a …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?