Primer on Russian Parliamentary Elections

Inroads: A Journal of Opinion, Annual 1996 | Go to article overview

Primer on Russian Parliamentary Elections


According to the 1993 Constitution, Russia is a Presidential Republic (more like the U.S. or France than Canada or Britain). The government is effectively controlled by the President, which can lead the Duma (parliament) to somewhat irresponsible positions in which MPs feel free to vote for populist decisions without being responsible for their enforcement or implementation.

The current Duma was elected in December 1995, which means that, for the next four years, Parliament will be controlled by Communists and their allies, no matter what the outcome of the presidential election. In accordance with the existing electoral legislation, half of the new Duma seats (225 out of 450) were distributed proportionally among the political parties winning at least 5% of ballots. In 1995, four such parties achieved recognition: 1. Ziuganov's Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) which won 22.3% of the vote (an increase from 15.4% in the December 1993 elections); 2. Zhirinovski's LDPR with 11.1% (down from 22.8% in 1993); 3. "Russia Our Home" (ROH), the new Nomenklatura party of the government with 9.9% (a decrease from the 15.4% won in 1993 as part of the coalition called "Russia's Choice" allied with Gaidar's genuine liberal democrats and the "Democratic Russia" movement); and 4. the Yabloko ("Apple") party, Yavlinski's Western-style social democratic movement with 6.9% (7.8% in 1993). Democratic Russia this time chose to support Yavlinski, while Gaidar's Democratic Choice ran separately but managed to gain only 3.9% of the ballots and, thus, no representation in this proportional party-list-based half of the Duma.

As a result, these four parties representing only 50.2% of the participating voters (or, given the participation rate of 64%, only 32% of the potential electorate) monopolized all 225 seats with none for the remaining 39 political parties and/or electoral blocs that scored less than the 5% minimum. (In comparison, in the previous Duma, 8 of the 13 competing parties, and 87% of all voters, qualified for representation.) A rough classification of the 43 political parties and blocs that competed produces seven tendencies with support as follows: 1. four Communist parties who together obtained 32.2% (apart from the national-socialist Ziuganov's CPRF there is, Stalinist V. Anpolov's Communists for the USSR, N. Ryzhkov's People's Power bloc, and the Agrarians); 2. five nationalist parties with 19.4% (including Zhirinovski's LDPR); 3. seven somewhat pro-government Centre-Left parties with 10.3% (none of which passed the 5%-threshold); 4. eight pro-government Centre parties (Russia Our Home and seven marginal parties) with 11. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Primer on Russian Parliamentary Elections
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.