Our China Economic Policy Needs Security-Based Realism
Byline: Alan Tonelson, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Americans just got an invaluable lesson in the wrong and right ways to meet the often-intertwined economic and military challenges posed by China. Learning it will greatly boost the odds of regaining real national economic health and safeguarding security.
The wrong way of handling China tragically has been the reigning approach under the past four presidents. Its latest expression - the Obama administration's decision that tariffs previously approved to reduce imports of massively subsidized solar panels from China will not cover such products if they contain key non-Chinese components.
This approach has produced far more than yet another instance of U.S. policymakers tying themselves up in tight, transparently ludicrous legalistic knots; of the law itself proving to be an idiot; or of Washington practically inviting Chinese tariff circumvention that could well finish off America's remaining solar-panel firms.
It has created a government hard-pressed even to identify the vital interests of its wealth-creating domestic industries - and the national prosperity they support - much less defend them. For America's economic policies too often require U.S. officials literally to ignore the long-term industrial, technological and security considerations that typically motivate Chinese (and other) economic predation to begin with.
As a result, Washington keeps fighting determined foreign drives for economic pre-eminence reactively and piecemeal. It keeps relying overwhelmingly on its system of trade law - and thus ultimately on tools originally developed to handle medieval crimes and property disputes, not global power struggles. And it will likely stay this course until it stops mindlessly defining China as an ordinary, indeed practically commercial, competitor country, committed to capitalism, the rule of law and transparency (at least to a growing extent), and thus representing merely an episodic violator of free-market norms.
The right way of dealing with multidimensional, systemic China challenges - based on a view of Beijing as realistic as it is overdue - was revealed Oct. 6 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. In a report endorsed by its Democratic and Republican members, the panel rocked U.S.-China relations by describing Chinese …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Our China Economic Policy Needs Security-Based Realism. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Washington Times (Washington, DC). Publication date: October 17, 2012. Page number: A10. © 2009 The Washington Times LLC. COPYRIGHT 2012 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.