Forty-Third Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology and the Law (January 2011 through December 2011)
Each year, the Journal provides a compilation of the most important and timely articles on computers, technology, and the law. The Bibliography, indexed by subject matter, is designed to be a research guide to assist our readers in searching for recent articles on computer and technology law. This year's annual Bibliography contains nearly 1000 articles, found through the examination of over 1000 periodicals.
The Bibliography aims to include topics on every legal aspect of computers and technology. However, as new issues in this field emerge, we welcome your suggestions for additional topics and sources, as well as your commentary on the Bibliography.
INDEX 1. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LAW PRACTICE 1.0 General 1.1 Computerized Legal Research 1.1.0 General 1.1.1 Online Legal Research 1.2 Law Office Management 1.2.0 General 1.2.1 Office Automation 1.2.2 Case Management 1.2.3 Case File Security 1.2.4 Internet Access 1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice 1.3.0 General 1.3.1 Tax Filing 1.3.2 Bankruptcy 1.3.3 Estate Planning 1.3.4 Real Estate 1.3.5 Advertising 2. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LITIGATION 2.0 General 2.1 Scientific Evidence 2.1.0 General 2.1.1 Expert Testimony 2.1.2 DNA Typing 2.1.3 Fingerprint 2.1.4 Lie Detection 2.1.5 Forensic Evidence 2.2 Demonstrative Evidence 2.2.0 General 2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence 2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence 2.3 Electronic Discovery 2.4 Courtroom and Judges 2.5 Dispute Resolution 3. COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY AND THE GOVERNMENT 3.0 General 3.1 Computers, Technology and Law Enforcement 3.2 Use of Computers and Technology by the Military 3.2.0 General 3.2.1 First Amendment Concerns 3.2.2 Antitrust 3.2.3 FCC Regulation 3.3 Use of Computers and Technology by State and Federal Legislatures 3.4 Regulation of Computers and Technology 4. ISSUES OF PRIVACY, SECURITY AND CRIME 4.0 General 4.1 Problems of Privacy 4.1.0 General 4.1.1 Data Privacy 4.1.2 Privacy in the Workplace 4.2 Security 4.2.1 Cyberwar 4.2.2 Encryption and Digital Signatures 4.3 Crime 4.3.0 General 4.3.1 Internet 5. COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION 5.0 General 5.1 Legal Education 6. COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS 6.0 General 6.1 Electronic Commerce 6.1.0 General 6.1.1 Taxation 6.2 Computers in Banking and Finance 6.2.0 General 6.2.1 On-line Securities Trading 6.3 Computers and Technology in the Transportation Industry 6.4 Computers and Technology in the Publishing Industry 6.5 Computers and Technology in Advertising 6.6 Computers and Technology in Accounting 7. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OF COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY 7.0 General 7.1 Patent 7.1.0 General 7.1.1 Software Patent 7.1.2 Biotech Patent 7.2 Software Copyright 7.2.0 General 7.2.1 User Interface 7.2.2 Fair Use 7.2.3 Video Game 7.3 Digital Copyright 7.3.0 General 7.3.1 Electronic Compilation 7.3.2 Computer Database 7.3.3 Multimedia 7.3.4 Computer-Generated Works 7.4 Trademark 7.5 Trade Secret 7.6 Semiconductor Chip Protection 7.7 Licensing 7.8 Intellectual Property Issues of the Internet 7.9 International Developments 7.9.0 General 7.9.1 GATT-TRIPS 7.9.2 NAFTA 7.9.3 Developments in Canada 7.9.4 Developments in Mexico and Latin America 7.9.5 Developments in Australia and New Zealand 7.9.6 Developments in Africa 7.9.7 Developments in Asia 7.9.8 Developments in Western Europe 7.9.9 Developments in Eastern Europe and Russia 8. COMPUTERS AND LEGAL REASONING 8.0 General 8.1 Artificial Intelligence 9. LEGAL ISSUES OF THE 1NTERNET 9.0 General 9.1 ISP and Internet Access 9.1.0 General 9.1.1 Net Neutrality 9.2 Domain Names 9.3 Civil Procedure in Cyberspace 9.4 Online Communities 9.4.0 General 9.4.1 Social Networking 9.4.2 Virtual Worlds 9.5 First Amendment Concerns 10. LAW AND TECHNOLOGY 10.0 General 10.1 Technology Transfer 10.2 Audio/Video Recording 10.3 Space Law 10.4 Medical Technology 10.4.0 General 10.4.1 Electronic Records 10.5 Science and Technology 10.5.0 General 10.5.1 Biotechnology 10.5.2 Pharmaceuticals 10.5.3 Stem Cells and Cloning 10.5.4 Nanotechnology 10.6 Environmental Law 10.6.0 General 10.6.1 Pollution 10.6.2 Hazardous Substances 10.6.3 Electromagnetic Fields 10.6.4 Nuclear Technology 10.6.5 Energy and the Environment 10.6.6 International Environmental Law Developments 10.7 Television 10.7.0 General 10.7.1 Satellite Television 10.7.2 Cable Television 10.8 Telecommunications 10.8.0 General 10.8.1 Telephone 10.8.2 Multimedia in Telecommunications 10.8.3 International Telecommunications Developments 10.9 Recording Industry 10.10 Broadband 11. FAMILY LAW 12. OTHER
1. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LAW PRACTICE
Jeffrey Allen, Techno-Ethics and the Practice of Law, 24 AM. J. OF FAM. L. 211 (2011).
John R. Forbush, Regulating the Use and Sharing of Energy Consumption Data." Assessing California's SB 1476 Smart Meter Privacy Statute, 75 ALB. L. REV. 341 (2011).
Jennifer Hammitt, Ethical Representation in a Database Age: HMIS Database Systems and Homeless Client Confidentiality, 13 T.M. COOLEY J. PRAC. & CLINICAL L.
285 (2011). Helia Garrido Hull, Legal Ethics for the Millennials."
Avoiding the Compromise of Integrity, 80 UMKC L. REV. 271 (2011).
Bruce H. Kobayashi and Larry E. Ribstein, Law's Information Revolution, 5 ARIZ. L. REV. 1169 (2011).
Tian Luo and Amar Mann, Survival and Growth of Silicon Valley High- Tech Businesses Born in 2000, 134 MONTHLY LAB. REV. 16 (2011).
Roberta Cooper Ramo, Ethics for American Lawyers in the Age of Twitter and the Cloud, 72 MONT. L. REV. 227 (2011).
Jennifer Shkabatur, Cities @ Crossroads: Digital Technology and Local Democracy in America, 76 BROOKLYN L. REV. 1413 (2011).
John F. Stanton, Breaking the Sound Barriers: How the Americans with Disabilities Act and Technology Have Enabled Deaf Lawyers to Succeed, 45 VAL. U. L. REV. 1185 (2011).
Harry Surden, Article, The Variable Determinacy Thesis, 12 Colum. SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 1 (2011).
1.1 Computerized Legal Research
Jessica Bozarth, Note, Copyright and Creditors: What Will be left of the King of Pop's Legacy?, 29 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L. J. 85 (2011).
Caroline Hart, Sustainable Regional Legal Practice: The Importance of Alliances and the Use of Innovative Information Technology by Legal Practices in Regional, Rural and Remote Queensland, 16 DEAKIN L. REV. 225 (2011).
Amanda Kennedy & Stephen Winn, Using Technology to Increase Support for Rural and Regional Legal Professionals, 16 DEAKIN L. REV. 209 (2011).
Ellie Margolis, Authority Without Borders: The Worm Wide Web and the Delegalization of Law, 41 SETON HALL L. REV. 909 (2011).
Peter W. Martin, Abandoning Law Reporters for Official Digital Case Law, 12 J. APP. PRAC. & PROCESS 25 (Spring 2011).
1.1.1 Online Legal Research
Kirsten K. Davis, Legal Forms As Rhetorical Transaction: Competency in the Context of Information and Efficiency, 79 UMKC L. REV. 667 (2011).
Susan Falk, Introduction to Researching Alaska Legislative History Materials, 28 ALASKA L. REV. 279 (December 2011).
Anne Klinefelter, When to Research is to Reveal: The Growing Threat to Attorney and Client Confidentiality from Online Tracking, 60 DEF. L.J. 71 (2011).
1.2 Law Office Management
Bridget C. E. Dooling, Legal Issues in E-Rulemaking, 63 ADMIN. L. REV. 893 (2011).
1.2.1 Office Automation
1.2.2 Case Management
1.2.3 Case File Security
Roland L. Trope & Sarah Jane Hughes, Red Skies in the Morning--Professional Ethics at the Dawn of Cloud Computing, 38 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 111 (2011).
1.2.4 Internet Access
Louise L. Hill, Gone but Not Forgotten: When Privacy, Policy and Privilege Collide, 9 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 565 (2011).
Kathleen M. Porter, Going Mobile: Are Your Company's Electronic Communications Policies Ready to Travel? 2011-DEC BUS. L. TODAY 1 (2011).
Phillip F. Weiss, Protecting a Right to Access Internet Content: The Feasibility o f Judicial Enforcement in a Non-neutral Network, 76 BROOKLYN L. REV. 383 (2011).
1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice
Michael R. Baumrind, Protecting Online Anonymity and Preserving Reputation Through Due Process, 27 GA. ST. U.L. REV. 757 (2011).
Amy Puliafico, Offshore Wind: What Steps Need to Be Taken to Ensure It Has A Future in America, 12 J. HIGH TECH. L. 330 (2011).
1.3.1 Tax Filing
1.3.3 Estate Planning
Michael D. Roy, Note, Beyond The Digital Asset Dilemma: Will Online Services Revolutionize Estate Planning? 24 QUINN. PROB. LAW JOUR. 376 (2011).
1.3.4 Real Estate
Robert C. Bird, Law, Strategy, and Competitive Advantage, 44 CONN. L. REV. 61 (2011).
Lucille A. Jewel, The Bramble Bush of Forking Paths: Digital Narrative, Procedural Rhetoric, and the Law, 14 YALE J. L. & TECH. 66 (2011).
David Kirk, Glorious Summer of 2011: Leaking, Tweeting, Blogging, Hacking and Rioting, 75 J. CRIM. L. 444 (2011).
Erin F. Norris, Note. Why the Internet Isn't Special: Restoring Predictability to Personal Jurisdiction, 53 ARIZ. L. REV. 1013 (2011).
Christina R. Weatherford, Judicial Sentencing Discretion Post-Booker: Are Judges Getting A Distorted View Through the Lens of Social Networking Sites?, 27 GA. ST. U.L. REV. 673 (2011).
2. COMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY IN LITIGATION
Ralph Artigliere, Sequestration for the Twenty-First Century: Disconnecting Jurors from the Internet During Trial, 59 DRAKE L. REV. 621 (2011).
Jennifer Lee Case, Extra! Read All About It: Why Notice By Newspaper Publication Fails to Meet Mullane's Desire-to-Inform Standard and How Modern Technology Provides a Viable Alternative, 45 GA. L. REV. 1095 (2011).
Russell D. Covey, Pervasive Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment, 80 MISS. L.J. 1289 (2011).
Jeff DeMot & Ben Depoorter, Technology and Torts: Memory costs, Nondurable Precautions and Interference Effects, 31 INT'L REV. OF L. AND ECON. 284 (2011).
Kristine F. Dorrain & Jonathan T. Rubens, Survey of the Law of Cyberspace: Introduction, 67 Bus. LAW. 255 (2011).
Holly Forsberg, Article, Diminishing the Attractiveness of Trolling: The Impacts of Recent Judicial Activity on Non-Practicing Entities, 12 PGH. J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 1 (2011).
Katherine M. Giblin, Comment, Click, Download, Causation: A Call for Uniformity and Fairness in Awarding Restitution to Those Victimized by Possessors of Child Pornography, 60 CATH. U.L. REV. 1109 (2011).
Lauren M. Gregory, Note, Hot Off the Presses: How Traditional Newspaper Journalism Can Help Reinvent the "Hot News" Misappropriation Tort in the Internet Age, 13 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 577 (2011).
Kevin F. King, Personal Jurisdiction, Internet Commerce, and Privacy: The Pervasive Legal Consequence of Modern Geolocation Technologies, 21 ALB. L.J. SCI & TECH. 61 (2011).
Jeff Kosseff, Article, Private or Public? Eliminating the Gertz Defamation Test, 2011 U. ILL. J.L. TECH. & POL'Y 249 (2011).
Elaine McArdle, Ramping Up New Ramps to Justice, HARV. L. BULL., Winter 2011, at 10.
Luke M. Milligan, Analogy Breakers: A Reality Check on Emerging Technologies, 80 MISS. L.J. 1319 (2011).
Caren Myers Morrison, Jury 2.0, 62 HASTINGS L.J. 1579 (2011).
Ian Rainey, Article, The War Over Information Technology Patents: How Microsoft v. i4i is Reforming the Mobile Entertainment Industry, 11 U. DENV. SPORTS & ENT. LAW J. 81 (2011).
Tracie E. Wandell. Geolocation and Jursidiction: From Purposeful Availment to Avoidance and Targeting on the Internet, 16 J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 275 (2011).
David P. Weber, The Magic of the Mortgage Electronic Registration System: It is and it Isn't, 85 AM. BANKR. L.J. 239 (2011).
Ben A. West, Note, Tort Liability for Video Game Manufacturers: Will Shifting Public Perceptions Lead to a Change in the Law?, 14 SMU SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 509 (2011).
2.1 Scientific Evidence
John H. Blume & Emily C. Paavola, Life, Death, and Neuroimaging: The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Defense's Use of Neuroimages in Capital Cases-Lessons from the Front, 62 MERCER L. REV. 909 (2011).
Oliver R. Goodenough & Micaela Tucker, Neuroscience Basics for Lawyers, 62 MERCER L. REV. 945 (2011).
Jozsef Meszaros, Achieving Peace of Mind: The Benefits of Neurobiological Evidence for Battered Women Defendants, 23 YALE J.L. & FEMINISM 117 (2011).
Sarah Murphy, The Potential Contribution of Neuroscienee to the Criminal Justice System of New Zealand, 17 AUCKLAND U.L. REV. 1 (2011).
Michael Roseland and Ronald Port, A Statistical Evaluation of Calibration Check Intervals, 44 CAN. SOC. FORENSIC SCI. J., no. 2, 2011.
Francis X. Shen & Owen D. Jones, Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons, 62 MERCER L. REV. 861 (2011).
Melissa Spanggard & Christopher M. Davidson, Remote Alcohol Monitor Technology Deemed Reliable, 39 J. AM. ACAD. PSYCHIATRY LAW 112 (2011).
2.1.1 Expert Testimony
Benjamin Ekenes, The Need for Formalities with Forensic Evidence: Whv the Melendez-Diaz Holding Should be Limited, 38 W. ST. U. L. REV. 209 (2011). Richard L. Elliott, Neuropsychiatry in the Courtroom, 62 MERCER L. REV. 933 (2011).
Christine Funk & Evan Berman, Rising to the Challenge of the NAS Report Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward: A Call for Demonstrated Competence Amongst Legal Practitioners, 37 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 683 (2011).
Edward J. Imwinkelried, Serendipitous Timing: The Coincidental Emergence of the New Brain Science and the Advent of an Epistemological Approach to Determining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony, 62 MERCER L. REV. 959 (2011).
Nicholas Klaiber, Note, Confronting Reality: Surrogate Forensic Science Witnesses Under the Confrontation Clause, 97 VA. L. REV. 199 (2011).
Amy Ma, Note, Mitigating the Prosecutors' Dilemma in Light of Melendez-Diaz: Live Two-Way Videoconferencing for Analyst Testimony Regarding Chemical Analysis, 11 NEV. L.J. 793 (2011).
Deana Pollard Sacks et al., Essay, Do Violent Video Games Harm Children? Comparing the Scientific Amicus Curiae "Experts" in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 106 NW. U. L. REV. COLLOQUY 1 (2011).
Ryan Sullivan, Note, The Aftermath of Melendez-Diaz, 129 S. Ct. 2527 (2000)--Identifying the Analyst Who Can Satisfy Confrontation, 89 NEB. L. REV. 561 (2011).
2.1.2 DNA Typing
Book Note, 10 J. HIGH TECH. L. 1 (2010-2011) (reviewing SHELDON KRIMSKY & TANIA SIMONCELLI, GENETIC JUSTICE: DNA BANKS, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, AND CIVIL LIBERTIES (2011)).
Kimberly Cogdell Boies, Misuse of DNA Evidence is not always a "Harmless Error": DNA Evidence, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and Wrongful Conviction, 17 TEX. WESLEYAN L. REV. 403 (2011).
Justin Brooks & Alexander Simpson, Blood Sugar Sex Magik: A Review of Postconviction DNA Testing Statutes and Legislative Recommendations, 59 DRAKE L. REV. 799 (2011).
Ashley Eiler, Note, Arrested Development: Reforming the Federal All-Arrestee DNA Collection Statute to Comply with the Fourth Amendment, 79 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1201 (2011).
Ryan M. Goldstein, Note, Improving Forensic Science Through State Oversight, 90 TEX. L. REV. 225 (2011).
David H. Kaye, Essay, DNA Database Trawls and the Definition of a Search in Boroian v. Mueller, 97 VA. L. REV. 41 (2011).
Elizabeth B. Ludwin King, A Conflict of Interests: Privacy, Truth, and Compulsory DNA Testing for Argentina's Children of the Disappeared, 44 CORNELL INT'L L.J. 535 (2011).
Mary McCarthy, Note, Am I My Brother's Keeper?.: Familial DNA Searches in the Twenty-First Century, 86 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 381 (2011).
Kristen McIntyre, Note, A Prisoner's Right to Access DNA Evidence to Prove His Innocence. Post-Osborne Options, 17 TEX. WESLEYAN L. REV. 565 (2011).
Terri Moore, Prosecutors Reinvestigate Ouestionable Evidence. Dallas Establishes "Conviction Integrity Unit ", 26 CRIM. JUST. 4 (2011).
Mike Silvestri, Naturally Shed DNA. The Fourth Amendment Implications in the Trail of Intimate Information We All Cannot Help But Leave Behind, 41 U. BALT. L. REV. 165 (2011).
Case Comment, Skinner v. Switzer, 125 HARV. L. REV. 321 (2011).
Micah Sucherman, Note, People v. Robinson: Developments and Problems in the Use of "John Doe" DNA Arrest Warrants, 99 CALIF. L. REV. 885 (2011).
Lauren G. Gallo, Article, The (Im)possibility of Standard Technical Measures for UGC Websites, 34 COLUM. J. L. & ARTS 283 (2011).
2.1.4 Lie Detection
Charles Adelsheim, Functional Magnetic Resonance Detection of Deception: Great as Fundamental Research, Inadequate as Substantive Evidence, 62 MERCER L. REV. 885 (2011).
J.R.H. Law, Cherry-Picking Memories: Why Neuroimaging-Based Lie Detection Requires a New Framework for the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence under FRE 702 and Daubert, 14 YALE J. L. & TECH. 1 (2011).
2.1.5 Forensic Evidence
Joseph P. Bono, Commentary on The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences, 58 UCLA L. REV. 781 (2011).
Jennifer M. Champagne, Genetic Testing and Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation: "Admissibility and Evaluation," 13 N.C.J.L. & TECH. 1 (2011).
Simon A. Cole & Rachel Dioso-Villa, Should Judges Worrv About The "CSI Effect"?, 47 CT. REV. 20 (2011).
Ronald J. Coleman & Paul F. Rothstein, Grabbing the Bullcoming by the Horns: How the Supreme Court Could Have Used Bullcoming v. New Mexico to Clarify Confrontation Clause Requirements for CSI-type Reports, 90 NEB. L. REV. 502 (2011).
Craig M. Cooley, Nurturing Forensic Science: How Appropriate Funding and Government Oversight Can Further Strengthen the Forensic Science Community, 17 TEX. WESLEYAN L. REV. 441 (2011).
Judge Nancy Gertner, Commentary on The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences, 58 UCLA L. REV. 789 (2011).
Paul C. Giannelli, Daubert and Forensic Science: The Pitfalls of Law Enforcement Control of Scientific Research, 2011 U. ILL. L. REV. 53 (2011).
Mark A. Godsey & Marie Alao, She Blinded Me With Science: Wrongful Convictions and the "Reverse CSI Effect", 17 TEX. WESLEYAN L. REV. 481 (2011).
Sean L. Harrington, Collaborating with a Digital Forensics Expert: Ultimate Tag-Team of Disastrous Duo?, 38 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 353 (2011).
M. Illes and M. Boue, Investigation of a Model for Stain Selection in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis, 44 CAN. SOC. FORENSIC SCI. J., no. 1, 2011, at 1.
Christopher Luche et al., Recovery of Bloodstain Patterns for Arson Scenes: Does Soot Removal Using Liquid Latex Damage Underlying Bloodstains, 44 CAN. SOC. FORENSIC SCI. J., no. 2, 2011.
Pierre Margot, Commentary on The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences, 58 UCLA L. REV. 795 (2011).
T.L. Martin, An Evaluation of the Intoxilyzer[R] 8000C Evidential Breath Alcohol Analyzer, 44 CAN. SOC. FORENSIC SCI. J., no. 1, 2011, 22.
A. McElrea et al., Truncation of Breath Alcohol Measurements and Its Effect on Peak Concentrations, 44 CAN. SOC. FORENSIC SCI. J., no. 1, 2011, at 13.
Jennifer L. Mnookin et al., The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences, 58 UCLA L. REV. 725 (2011).
Donald E. Shelton et al.. Studying Juror Expectations For Scientific Evidence: A New Model For Looking At The CSI Myth, 47 COURT REVIEW 8 (2011).
2.2 Demonstrative Evidence
John G. Browning, Digging for the Digital Dirt: Discovery and Use of Evidence from Social Media Sites, 14 SMU SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 465 (2011).
Caren Myers Morrison. Can The Jury Trial Survive Google?, 25 CRIM. JUST. 4 (2011).
Lisa J. Steele, Smile for the Security Camera, CHAMP, June 2011, at 36.
2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence
Giuseppe M. Fazari, Testing the Validity of Pupillometer Technology against Traditional Drug Screening Instruments, 75 FED. PROBATION 37 (2011).
John Nawara, Machine Learning. Face Recognition Technology Evidence in Criminal Trials, 50 U. LOUISVILLE L. REV. 601 (2011).
Gareth Norris, Computer-Generated Exhibits: The Use and Abuse of Animations in Legal Proceedings, 40 SUM BRIEF 10 (2011).
Adam Teitcher, Note, Weaving Functional Brain Imaging into the tapestry of Evidence: a Case for Functional Neuroimaging in Federal Criminal Courts, 80 FORDHAM L. REV. 355 (2011).
2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence
Alan Ellis & Tess Lopez, Department. Federal Sentencing, Use of Video, 26 CRIM. JUST. 60 (2011).
Jonathan Frieden & Leigh Murray, The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, 17 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 5 (2011).
Natalie D. Montell, Note, A New Test for Two-Way Video Testimony: Bringing Maryland v. Craig Into the Technological Era, 50 U. LOUISVILLE L. REV. 361 (2011).
John Nawara, Note, Machine Learning: Face Recognition Technology Evidence in Criminal Trials, 49 U. LOUISVILLE L. REV. 601 (2011).
Joel Simberg, Displaying Digital Media During Opening Statements. Tactics, Techniques, and Pitfalls, 60 DEPAUL L. REV. 789 (2011).
Yvette Tinsley & Elisabeth McDonald, Use of Alternative Ways of Giving Evidence by Vulnerable Witnesses: Current Proposals, Issues and Challenges, 42 VUWLR 705 (2011).
2.3 Electronic Discovery
Charles W. Adams, Spoliation of Electronic Evidence: Sanctions Versus Advocacy, 18 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 1 (2011).
Wendy K. Akbar, Evidence That Bytes: E-Discovery in the Age of Hidden Data, Clouds, Facebook, Twitter, and the Digital Family, 15 J. INTERNET L. 1 (2011).
Alberto G. Araiza, Electronic Discovery in the Cloud, 2011 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 8 (2011).
Jason Baron, Law in the Age of Exabytes: Some Further thoughts on 'Information Inflation' and Current Issues in E-Discovery Search, 17 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 9 (2011).
Bennett Borden et al., Four Years Later: How the 2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules Have Reshaped the E-Discovery Landscape and are Revitalizing the Civil Justice System, 17 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 10 (2011).
Allison Clemency, Comment, "Friending", "Following", and "Digging" up Evidentiary Dirt: The Ethical implications of Investigating Information on Social Media, Websites, 43 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 1021 (2011).
David Degnan, Accounting for the Costs of Electronic Discovery, 12 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 151 (2011).
Herbert B. Dixon, We've Got Mail, and you Can't Have it, 50 JUDGES' JOURNAL 37 (2011).
An E-Discovery Model Order, 21 FED. CIR. B.J. 347 (2011).
Steven S. Gensler, Some Thoughts on The Lawyer's E-Volving Duties in Discovery, 60 DEF. L.J. 1 (2011).
Mama Grossman & Gordon Cormack, Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery can be More Effective and More Efficient than Exhaustive manual Review, 17 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 11 (2011).
Robert Hardaway et al., E-Discovery's Threat to Civil Litigation: Reevaluating Rule 26 for the Digital Age, 63 RUTGERS L. REV. 521 (2011).
Hausfeld LLP & Milberg LLP, E-Discoverv Today: The Fault Lies Not In Our Rules..., 2011 FED. CTS. L. REV. 1 (2011).
Theodore C. Hirt, The Quest for "Proportionality" in Electronic Discovery--Moving, From Theory To Reality in Civil Litigation, 2011 FED. CTS. L. REV. 171 (2011).
Adjoa Linzy, The Attorney-Client Privilege and Discovery of Electronically-Stored Information, 2011 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 1 (2011).
Robert C. Manlowe et al., Paradigm Shifts in E-Discovery Litigation: Cooperate or Continue to Pay Dearly, 78 DEF. COUNS. J. 170 (2011).
Kristen L. Mix, Discovery of Social Media, 2011 FED. CTS. L. REV. 119 (2011).
Jennifer Nicholls, Comment, A Proportional Response: Amending the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure to Minimize Abusive Discovery Practices, OR. L. REV. 1445 (2011).
Tom Turner & John Tredennick, Smart Sampling in E-Discovery: Reduce Document Review Costs without Compromising Results, TENN. B.J., Oct. 2011, at 16.
Megan Uncel. "Facebook is now Friends with the Court": Current Federal Rules and Social Media Evidence, 52 JURIMETRICS J. 43 (2011).
Ryan A. Ward, Note, Discovering Facebook: Social Network Subpoenas and the Stored Communications Act, 24 HARV. J. LAW & TECH. 563 (Spring 2011).
Gary Wiener, The Ethical Minefield of E-Discovery, 49 HOUSTON LAWYER 32 (November/December 2011).
2.4 Courtroom and Judges
Dana Adams, Access Denied? Inconsistent Jurisprudence on the Open Court Principle and Media Access to Exhibits in Canadian Criminal Cases, 49 ALBERTA L. REV. 177 (2011).
Katharine A. Alexander, Comment, Bullseye on the Nation's Back: Combating the Heightened Threat of Pedestrian Economic Criminals, 19 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 559 (2011).
Katie Angliss, Feature, Perspectives from the Bench: Technology in the Pittsburgh Courtroom, 11 PGH. J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 1 (2011).
Emily Babcock & Kate Johansen, Issuing of Sentencing and Public Defense: Remote Justice? Expanding the Use of Interactive Video Teleconference in Minnesota Criminal Proceedings, 37 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 652 (2011).
Patrick Bickley, Note, Dependent on the Jury: Anticipation and Obviousness of Dependent Patent Claims and Irreconcilable Jury Verdict, 86 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 419 (2011).
John G. Browning, Digging for the Digital Dirt: Discovery and Use of Evidence from Social Media Sites, 14 SMU SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 465, (2011).
Herbert B. Dixon, Texting, Tweeting, and Other Internet Abbreviations, 50 JUDGES' JOURNAL 30 (2011).
Karen Eltis, The Judicial System in the Digital Age. Revisiting the Relationship Between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context, 56 MCGILL L.J. 289 (2011).
Michelle Ernst, Note, Reforming the Non-Obvious Judicial Inquiry, 29 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L. J. 663 (2011).
Susan B. Flohr et al., A Review of Recent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Area Summary: 2010 Trademark Law Decisions of the Federal Circuit, 60 AM. U.L. REV. 1159 (2011).
Paul Grimm, Federal Rule of Evidence 502: Has it Lived Up to its Potential?, 17 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 8 (2011).
Brian E. Hamilton, Review of Selected 2010 California Legislation: Government: Chapter 167: Taking Court Records Management from the Stone Age to the Digital Age, 42 MCGEORGE L. REV. 597 (2011).
Thaddeus Hoffmeister, Applying Rules of Discovery to Information Uncovered About Jurors, 59 UCLA L. REV. DISC. 28 (2011).
William G. Kelly, Enhanced Communication, Efficiency, and Security, 50 JUDGES' JOURNAL 28 (2011).
Kristin M. Makar, Taming Technology in the Context of The Public Access Doctrine: New Jersey's Amended Rule 1:38, 41 SETON HALL L. REV. 1071 (2011).
Michael S. Quinn, Wrotten But Not Dead. High Court of New York Signals Legislature to Review Televised Testimony at Criminal Trial, 21 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 193 (2011).
Kenneth Rashaum, U.S. Legal Holds Across Borders: A Legal Conundrum?, 13 N.C.J.L. & TECH. 69 (2011).
Farid Sharaby, Comment, Computer Hacking as a Deceptive Device: Why the Courts Must Give Computers Legal Consciousness to Hold Hackers Liable for Insider Trading, 42 MCGEORGE L. REV. 929 (2011).
2.5 Dispute Resolution
Michael G. Bowers, Note, Implementing an Online Dispute Resolution Scheme: Using Domain Name Registration Contracts to Create A Workable Framework, 64 VAND. L. REV. 1265 (2011).
Rebecca Brennan, Note, Mismatch.com: Online Dispute Resolution and Divorce, 13 CARDOZO. J. CONFLICT. RESOL. 197 (2011).
Susan Nauss Exon, Symposium, Forecasting the Future: Cutting Edge Issues in ADR: Maximizing Technology to Establish Trust in an Online, Non-Visual Mediation Setting, 33 U. LA VERNE L. REV. 27 (2011).
Charles Kent, Article, The Case For Mediation of Intellectual Property Disputes, CAN. INTELL. PROP. REV., June 2011, at 139.
Matthew H. Ormsbee, Note, Music to Everyone's Ears: Binding Mediation in Music Rights Disputes, 13 CARDOZO. J. CONFLICT. RESOL. 225 (2011).
Lucille M. Ponte, Getting a Bad Rap? Unconscionability in Clickwrap Dispute Resolution Clauses and a Proposal for Improving the Quality of These Online Consumer "Products ", 26 OHIO ST. J. ON DISP. RESOL. 119 (2011).
Colin Rule et al., Symposium Issue: International Academy of Commercial and Consumer Law, 15th Biennial Meeting, Toronto, July 21-24, 2001: Consumer Protection: Online Small Claim Dispute Resolution Developments--Progress on a Soft Law for Cross-Border Consumer Sale, 29 PENN ST. INT'L L. REV. 651 (2011).
Allison O. Skinner, Article, Alternative Dispute Resolution Expands Into Pre-Trial Practice: An Introduction to the Role of E-Neutrals, 13 CARDOZO. J. CONFLICT. RESOL. 113 (2011).
Anne Louise St. Martin & J. Derek Mason, Arbitration. A Quick and Effective Means for Patent Dispute Resolution, 12 N.C.J.L. & TECH. 301 (2011).
Phillip K. Vacchio & Joshua L. Wolinsky, Note, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: It's in Title VII's Genes, 29 HOFSTRA LAB. & EMP. L.J. 229 (2011).
3. COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY AND THE GOVERNMENT
Julie Adler, The Public's Burden in A Digital Age: Pressures on Intermediaries and the Privatization of Internet Censorship, 20 J.L. & POL'Y 231 (2011).
Talal Aladwani, The Supply of Containers and "Seaworthiness "--The Rotterdam Rules Perspective, 42 J. MAR. L. & COM. 185 (2011).
Benjamin J. Balter, Note, Toward a More Agile Government: The Case for Rebooting Federal IT Recruitment, 41 PUB. CONT. L.J. 149 (2011).
Victor Bekkers & Rebecca Moody, Visual Events & Electronic Government: What Do Pictures Mean in Digital Government for Citizen Relations?, 28 GOV'T INFO. Q. 457 (2011).
Amanda Harmon Cooley, Guarding Against A Radical Redefinition of Liability for Internet Misrepresentation: The United States v. Drew Prosecution and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 14 J. INTERNET L. 1 (2011).
Sarah Fehm, Note, From iPod to e-Waste: Building a Successful Framework for Extended Producer Responsibility in the United States, 40 PUB. CONT. L.J. 829 (2011).
Jeanine Finn, Collaborative knowledge construction in digital environments: Politics, policy and communities, 28 GOV'T INFO. Q 409 (2011).
Michael Froomkin, Almost Free: An Analysis of ICANN's Affirmation of Commitments, 9 J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 187 (2011).
Ellen P. Goodman & Anne H. Chen. Digital Public Service Media Networks to Advance Broadband and Enrich Connected Communities, 9 J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 81 (2011).
Daniel F. Hardin, Note, Blowing Electronic Smoke: Electronic Cigarettes, Regulation, and Protecting the Public Health, 2011 U. ILL. J.L. TECH. & POL'Y 433 (2011).
Jamie L. Hester, Recent Development, The Espionage Act and Today's "High-Tech Terrorist," 12 N.C.J.L. & TECH. ON. 177 (2011).
Muhammad Kamal et al., Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration in UK local Government: An exploratory study, 28 GOV'T INFO. Q 200 (2011).
Sally Katzen, Governing in the Information Age: Technology as a Tool of Democratic Engagement, 32 CARDOZO L. REV. 2285 (2011).
Danielle M. Kidd, Note, E-Verify: Promoting Accountability and Transparency in Federal Procurement Through Electronic Employment Verification, 40 PUB. CONT. L.J. 829 (2011).
Margaret B. Kwoka, The Freedom of Information Act Trial, 61 AM. U.L. REV. 217 (2011).
Adrian McDonald, Article, Down the Rabbit Hole: The Madness of State Film Incentives as a "Solution" to Runaway Production, 14 U. PA. J. BUS. L. 85 (2011).
Rebekah A. Z. Monson & Elizabeth M. Hein, Two Steps Forward, One Step Back. HHS Invests in Health IT Infrastructure, but Admits to Failures in Security Enforcement, 24 HEALTH LAWYER 34 (2011).
MaryBeth Musumeci, Augmenting Advocacy: Giving Voice to the Medical-Legal Partnership Model in Medicaid Proceedings and Beyond, 44 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 857 (2011).
Fay Pappas, Note, Gulf Coast Blowout: How the BP Oil Spill is Corroding Communities and What Attorneys & Policymakers Must Do To Stop It, 22 U. FLA. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 229 (2011).
Christopher G. Reddick, Customer Relationship Management technology and organizational change: Evidence for the bureaucratic and e-Government paradigms, 28 GOV'T INFO. Q. 346 (2011).
David J. Rutenberg, Note, Silence of the Spam: Improving the CAN-SPAM Act by Including an Expanded Private Cause of Action, 14 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 225 (2011).
Paul N. Singarella & Marc T. Campopiano, The Role of Economics in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation after Energy, 35 ENVIRONS ENVTL. L. & POL'Y J. 101 (2011).
Christopher Soghoian, An End to Privacy Theater: Exposing and Discouraging Corporate Disclosure of User Data to the Government, 12 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 191 (2011).
Victoria Wilson, Note, Laptops and the Border Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment: Protecting the United States Borders From Bombs, Drugs, and the Pictures from Your Vacation, 65 U. MIAMI L. REV. 999 (2011).
Dimitrios Zissis & Dimitrios Lekkas, Securing e-Government and e-Voting with an open cloud computing architecture, 28 GOV'T INFO. Q 239 (2011).
3.1 Computers, Technology and Law Enforcement
Alissa R. Ackerman et al., Who are the people in your neighborhood? A descriptive analysis of individuals on public sex offender registries, 34 INT'L J. OF L. & PYSCHIATRY 135 (2011).
Leanne Andersen. Peoole v. Diaz: Warrantless Searches of Cellular Phones. Stretching the Search Incident to Arrest Doctrine Beyond Breaking Point, 39 W. ST. U.