Are Canadian and U.S. Social Assistance Policies Converging?

By Boychuk, Gerard | Canadian-American Public Policy, July 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Are Canadian and U.S. Social Assistance Policies Converging?


Boychuk, Gerard, Canadian-American Public Policy


Various interpretations of social policy in Canada and the United States alternatively see either persisting patterns of distinctiveness between these countries that appear likely to extend into the fore-seeable future, or warn that Canada may be on the brink of "...a massive restructuring of social programmes along American lines." (2) Arguments in the latter camp often focus on economic and cultural integration as the forces driving policy harmonization between the two countries.

These more general debates about social policy in Canada and the United States may be examined from the vantage point of the issue of social assistance; that is, cash and in-kind benefits provided to those deemed to be without the means for an adequate level of subsistence. Despite being only one component of the larger welfare state, last-resort social assistance plays a particularly crucial role in determining the character of a welfare state through providing in the final instance for those who fail in the market or do not receive adequate support within the family. Polanyi's The Great Transformation provides a compelling account of the considerable significance of last-resort assistance in shaping other social institutions, particularly the market. Certainly the welfare state includes a wide variety of policy areas such as income maintenance, labor market policies, education, and housing among others; however, "policies for the needy" constitute "the focal point of a social welfare system." (3)

Gerard Boychuk holds the Izaak Walton Killam Memorial postdoctoral fellowship in the department of political science at the University of Alberta. Among his recent work are "Reforming the Canadian Social Assistance Complex: The Provincial Welfare States and Canadian Federalism," in Canada: The State of the Federation, 1995; "Floor or Ceiling: Standards in Social Assistance," Policy Options 17, 5 (June 1996); and a book-length study titled Patchworks of Purpose: The Development of Provincial Social Assistance in Canada (forthcoming, 1998).

There have been and continue to be significant differences (outlined in the first section of this paper) between the American and Canadian social assistance complexes. (4) The conventional wisdom is that social assistance policies have tended to be more generous in Canada than the United States, and that the central government in Canada has played a large role in fostering such generosity. But the reality is much more complex. Neither in terms of the chronology of the initial inception of mothers' allowance programs (precursors to modern social assistance) nor in terms of benefit levels have Canadian provinces been more generous than their American counterparts for single mothers with dependents. In addition, central government involvement through both federal and national programs for social assistance developed earlier in the United States than in Canada. (5) Then in the 1960s Canada moved ahead of the U.S. in terms of the assistance provided to categories of people in poverty other than those categories which in the U.S. would be eligible for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The two countries have continued to diverge over the course of the past thirty years. Social assistance in the U.S. continues to be characterized by a much stronger central government presence than in Canada, and there are no Canadian analogues to the U.S. national assistance programs; yet, the Canadian social assistance complex in the contemporary period extends considerably more generous assistance to a range of individuals and families in need who receive only minimal assistance across the border.

The second section offers an interpretation of the distinct development of social assistance in the U.S. and Canada which challenges the assumptions underpinning arguments for convergence. The trajectories of the Canadian and American social assistance systems are best explained by reference to the distinct socio-economic contexts in which these systems initially emerged, the impact of institutionalized policy traditions in reinforcing differences between these two systems, and, especially in regards to current patterns of development, the impact of race.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Are Canadian and U.S. Social Assistance Policies Converging?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?