Little Humility, Please: Human Rights and Social Policy in the United States

By Wronka, Joseph | Harvard International Review, Annual 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Little Humility, Please: Human Rights and Social Policy in the United States

Wronka, Joseph, Harvard International Review

JOSEPH WRONKA is Associate Professor of Social Work at Springfield College and Research Associate at the Heller School of Brandeis University's Center for Social Change.

The 1998 US Department of State's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices do not review the status of human rights in the United States, officially because Congress does not "appropriate funds to monitor its own country." Certainly these annual reports, written in part to shape policy, are helpful, if only because they alert the world to human rights atrocities committed in foreign countries. But what about human rights abuses in the United States? The United States is a powerful moral leader when it comes to monitoring international human rights, but its failure to monitor itself seriously compromises its credibility.

The Leadership Role of the US

To be sure, the United States has played a leadership role in the development of international norms of human rights. For example, largely upon the initiative of the United States, members of the international community met at the Conference of Evian in 1938 to stop the abuses of the Third Reich. Although that conference failed, it was an American, Eleanor Roosevelt, who chaired the drafting committee of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights a few years later. This landmark manifesto was ratified by the United States and the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, with no dissent. Today, that document is increasingly referred to as "customary international law," by which all countries must abide. More recently, the United States played a pivotal role in the International Human Rights Vienna Conference in 1993 by urging the establishment of a High Commissioner of Human Rights, a position presently held by the able Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland.

The United States' pride in its historical leadership role ought to be tempered with humility, however. While it continually admonishes nations that fail to follow the basic guidelines of human dignity and justice accepted throughout the international community, it prevents the international community from criticizing its own human rights practices. Furthermore, the United States has failed to practice what it preaches by refusing to ratify various important human rights initiatives, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child (ROC, 1989), the Convention on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR, 1966), and the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW, 1981). While the United States has been a major leader in the development of international norms of human rights, its abstention from the ratification of numerous conventions supported by the majority of the United Nations has greatly eroded the credibility of its moral leadership. To its credit, the United States has ratified several initiatives, including the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CEAFRD, 1969), and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT, 1984).

Who guards the guardians?

Why is the United States so aggressive in pursuing human rights violations elsewhere, yet so resistant to examining its own human rights situation? As Plato asked, "Who guards the guardians?" The reason the United States refuses to sign on to these conventions is simply that numerous domestic policy changes would have to be made were the United States forced to measure up to various international human rights standards. Indeed, legislation in the United States would be drastically transformed under the auspices of the numerous human rights conventions that the United States has refused to ratify. Current laws pertaining to children, poverty, welfare, and crime would be seriously affected if the United States were to confront them with the international human rights norms embodied in the ROC, CEDAW, and the CESCR.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Little Humility, Please: Human Rights and Social Policy in the United States


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?