No Place/like Home: Terry Gilliam's "1984 1/2," Brazil

By Taylor, Ed | West Virginia University Philological Papers, May 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

No Place/like Home: Terry Gilliam's "1984 1/2," Brazil


Taylor, Ed, West Virginia University Philological Papers


"8:49 p.m.... Somewhere in the 20th Century" words superimposed over a salmonsunset-tinged, creamy cloudscape through which the camera--after the film's initial black screen, a waking eye or a dreaming one?--flies: with this image, Terry Gilliam opens his visionary 1985 film Brazil. In introducing that blurring of certainty and uncertainty, of precise knowledge and ambiguity, of reality and imagination, the film immediately hints at fundamental principles that foreshadow an act of artistic patricide: Brazil's contradiction of the film's key antecedent and inspiration, Orwell's 1984.

Branham and Pearce note: "Every communicative act is a text that derives meaning from the context of expectations and constraints in which it is experienced" (qtd. in Rogers 41): Brazil's context is 1984. An early working title for the movie was "1984 1/2," according to Variety and other sources. Gilliam has said: "When I approach any film I start by digging up whatever seems applicable--in the case of Brazil, we can go back to 1984, the book" ("Director's commentary"). Brazil, however, slyly undermines 1984 and diverges from the book's forecast of the inevitability of statist omnipotence. While sounding a darker, more accurate warning concerning "Big Brother," it also presents a paradoxical happy-unhappy ending to their joint story telling.

The two works, while differing politically, share the positing of a phenomenological truth. In spite of both Webster's definitions and generally lived definitions of reality--a word that appears as a graffito on a wall in Shangri-La Towers in Brazil--the novel and movie convincingly argue that "reality" doesn't exist. Instead, contemporary political societies have "realities," (e.g., "framing" in American political discourse today) and these are, according to Wheeler, "derivative: cannot be considered independent; are plural and variable depending on the who, when and where of individual perception; and crucially can be manipulated and programmed (or deprogrammed) using the correct tools" (95). In essence, not history but lived reality down to the grain of memory and fact is written by the victor.

Reflecting this truth, and its corollary that literary naturalism and realism can be not only impotent but active distractions from "truth" in exploring twentieth-century political reality, in Brazil and 1984, the authors looked elsewhere for forms to depict the political and social worlds that disturbed them both. Orwell, for only the second time in his career, used fable. He hews his narrative to a "one-step-beyond" style, in which the fabulistic world he creates is only, for most of the book, one step beyond the everyday lived reality of mid-twentieth century England. He uses his earnestly wrought fable, however, to argue that imagination and personal life were incompatible with and impossible in a totalitarian society of the kind he saw as an outcome of political evolution in both the East and the West.

Brazil, written by Gilliam, Tom Stoppard, and Charles McKeown, weaves together numerous literary threads in its warp, from Raymond Chandler to Thomas Hobbes, Franz Kafka, Anthony Burgess, Ray Bradbury, and Lewis Carroll. At its heart, however, the film is a variation of literary chivalric romance. (It should be noted that Gilliam explicitly referenced chivalric and specifically Grail romance with his 1991 film The Fisher King.) Gilliam does not constrain his story using a "one-step-beyond" style, although he insists that all the key elements in the film's world, regardless of their outrageousness, came directly from life and history ("Director's commentary"). This reflects a fundamental truth of Gilliam's not shared by Orwell: the power of dream and imagination as counter-discourse in a totalitarian paradigm.

The traditional chivalric romance was constructed around a core of four common elements. First is the Hero, often wounded in some way. Next is the Lady, symbol of purity and love, of spirit unstained by body or life.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

No Place/like Home: Terry Gilliam's "1984 1/2," Brazil
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?