The War on Drugs

By Williams, Daniel | Contemporary Review, September 2012 | Go to article overview

The War on Drugs


Williams, Daniel, Contemporary Review


THE war on drugs was declared in 1983. What has been achieved since the declaration? Have we won the war? And if not, will we ever win the war? Do we even expect to win the war on drugs? General Douglas MacArthur once said, 'It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.' And he also said, 'In war there is no substitute for victory'. So surely to lose the war on drugs is to lose our way of life--to lose what we know as society.

So, how are we doing in this war? In order to answer that, I feel we should ask ourselves first if we have ever taken drugs. How many of us have smoked marijuana in our lives? As more generations read this essay, the answer will become obvious--that almost everyone of us has smoked it, no matter who we are or where we come from. What about more potent drugs? How many of us have taken some form of cocaine or opiate or synthesised drug? Though the number is reduced when referring to higher class drugs, the question we should really be asking is how many of us have been affected, perhaps by a family member or a friend, who has become addicted? Is it right that we should accept that while those closest to us cheat us, and steal, some drug dealer, uneducated and wearing a mask across his face, should be able to drive a Lexus?

In a war on drugs we should be strong, unmerciful, and uncompromising. And where in the first place is there room for compromise? How do we punish those using drugs? Should they be punished at all?

We must understand that drugs are illegal, and that they are illegal for a good reason: taking drugs is something that we all know is wrong, just as we know that mugging someone is wrong, or speeding down the motorway is wrong. Users become a weak chain in society and to family life because they take and they take, and give only to cartels and corrupt governments. Surely it is not right to think that we are wrong for punishing people who break down the social structure for their own selfishness (and while I understand that some people are more vulnerable than others, there is never an excuse for crime; especially not for the majority). Drugs from the famous Golden Triangle have been a massive problem for Thailand, the main transit point for opium and amphetamines. What did Thaksin Shinawatra, the former Prime Minister of Thailand, do about this? And what did he achieve?

Firstly, he proved my argument of public education and social denunciation (especially amongst the young) wrong. Social advancement of drug condemnation will not be quick enough; even existent. In terms of social advancement, we are more likely to each own iPads than collectively denounce illicit drugs. (Even if future generations read this essay and iPads are outdated, drugs will still be ubiquitous.) When the Thai authorities realised this in 2003, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra fought harder, deciding to target not the consumption source, but the distributing source. While Human Rights organisations worried about the death toll of drug dealers, Thaksin Shinawatra worried about the death toll of victims of drug abuse. His policy consisted of:

1. Targeting dealers;

2. Users to be considered as patients if in need of treatment;

3. Allocated targets in each province concerning the number of arrests and seizures;

4. Awarding government officials for achieving targets;

5. Ruthless implementation.

Despite accusations by the political opposition of corruption (which are ambiguous), his strong stance against such a highly moral issue was admirable, but the results were mainly deplored by the national and international media: flawed blacklists, innocent deaths, extrajudicial killings, children subjected to seeing the killings, and trigger-happy policemen. But one thing is true. This is true: I have a large family in Thailand; two of my relations were involved in illicit drugs. One was a dealer, and the other was a user; both of them stopped, however, under Shinawatra's policies for fear of being shot, and both started again when Shinawatra was ousted and the policies eradicated.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The War on Drugs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.